Παρασκευή 31 Ιανουαρίου 2020

Our Atlantean Ancestors (Rudolf Steiner - Cosmic Memory)


Rudolf Steiner - Cosmic Memory (Prehistory of Earth and Man)

These early lectures reconstruct events between the origin of the earth and the beginning of recorded history and include a core investigation of the origins, achievements and fate of the Atlanteans and Lemurians. These remarkable “lost” root races developed the first concepts of “good” and “evil,” manipulated the forces of nature, laid the groundwork of all human legal and ethical systems, and defined and nurtured the distinctive yet complementary powers of men and women that brought humankind, many centuries ago, to its highest artistic, intellectual, and spiritual attainments.

Chapter 3 - Our Atlantean Ancestors

Our Atlantean ancestors differed more from present-day man than he would imagine whose knowledge is confined wholly to the world of the senses. This difference extended not only to the external appearance but also to spiritual faculties. Their knowledge, their technical arts, indeed their entire civilization differed from what can be observed today. If we go back to the first periods of Atlantean humanity we find a mental capacity quite different from ours.
Logical reason, the power of arithmetical combining, on which everything rests that is produced today, were totally absent among the first Atlanteans. On the other hand, they had a highly developed memory. This memory was one of their most prominent mental faculties. For example, the Atlantean did not calculate as we do, by learning certain rules which he then applied. A "multiplication table" was something totally unknown in Atlantean times. Nobody impressed upon his intellect that three times four is twelve.
In the event that he had to perform such a calculation he could manage because he remembered identical or similar situations. He remembered how it had been on previous occasions. One need only realize that each time a new faculty develops in an organism, an old faculty loses power and acuteness. The man of today is superior to the Atlantean in logical reasoning, in the ability to combine. On the other hand, memory has deteriorated. Nowadays man thinks in concepts; the Atlantean thought in images. When an image appeared in his soul he remembered a great many similar images which he had already experienced, He directed his judgment accordingly.
For this reason all teaching at that time was different from what it became later. It was not calculated to furnish the child with rules, to sharpen his reason. Instead, life was presented to him in vivid images, so that later he could remember as much as possible when he had to act under particular conditions. When the child had grown and had gone out into life, for everything he had to do he could remember something similar which had been presented to him in the course of his education.
He could manage best when the new situation was similar to one he had already seen. Under totally new conditions the Atlantean had to rely on experiment, while in this respect much has been spared modern man due to the fact that he is equipped with rules. He can easily apply these in those situations which are new to him. The Atlantean system of education gave a uniformity to all of life. For long periods things were done again and again in the same way. The faithful memory did not allow anything to develop which was even remotely similar to the rapidity of our present-day progress. One did what one had always "seen" before. One did not invent; one remembered.
He was not an authority who had learned much, but rather he who had experienced much and therefore could remember much. In the Atlantean period it would have been impossible for someone to decide an important matter before reaching a certain age. One had confidence only in a person who could look back upon long experience.
What has been said here was not true of the initiates and their schools. For they are in advance of the stage of development of their period. For admission into such schools, the decisive factor is not age, but whether in his previous incarnations the applicant has acquired the faculties for receiving higher wisdom.
The confidence placed in the initiates and their representatives during the Atlantean period was not based on the richness of their personal experience, but rather on the antiquity of their wisdom. In the case of the initiate, personality ceases to have any importance. He is totally in the service of eternal wisdom. Therefore the characteristic features of a particular period do not apply to him.
While the power to think logically was absent among the Atlanteans (especially the earlier ones), in their highly developed memory they possessed something which gave a special character to everything they did. But with the nature of one human power others are always connected. Memory is closer to the deeper natural basis of man than reason, and in connection with it other powers were developed which were still closer to those of subordinate natural beings than are contemporary human powers. Thus the Atlanteans could control what one calls the life force.
As today one extracts the energy of heat from coal and transforms it into motive power for our means of locomotion, the Atlanteans knew how to put the germinal energy of organisms into the service of their technology. One can form an idea of this from the following. Think of a kernel of seed-grain. In this an energy lies dormant. This energy causes the stalk to sprout from the kernel.
Nature can awaken this energy which reposes in the seed. Modern man cannot do it at will. He must bury the seed in the ground and leave the awakening to the forces of nature. The Atlantean could do something else. He knew how one can change the energy of a pile of grain into technical power, just as modern man can change the heat energy of a pile of coal into such power. Plants were cultivated in
the Atlantean period not merely for use as foodstuffs but also in order to make the energies dormant in them available to commerce and industry.
Just as we have mechanisms for transforming the energy dormant in coal into energy of motion in our locomotives, so the Atlanteans had mechanisms in which they — so to speak — burned plant seeds, and in which the life force was transformed into technically utilizable power. The vehicles of the Atlanteans, which floated a short distance above the ground travelled at a height lower than that of the mountain ranges of the Atlantean period, and they had steering mechanisms by the aid of which they could rise above these mountain ranges.
One must imagine that with the passage of time all conditions on our earth have changed very much. Today, the above-mentioned vehicles of the Atlanteans would be totally useless. Their usefulness depended on the fact that then the cover of air which envelops the earth was much denser than at present. Whether in face of current scientific beliefs one can easily imagine such greater density of air, must not occupy us here. Because of their very nature, science and logical thinking can never decide what is possible or impossible. Their only function is to explain what has been ascertained by experience and observation. The above-mentioned density of air is as certain for occult experience as any fact of today given by the senses can be.
Equally certain however is the fact, perhaps even more at that time the water on the whole earth was much thinner than today. Because of this thinness the water could be directed by the germinal energy used by the Atlanteans into technical services which today are impossible. As a result of the increased density of the water, it has become impossible to move and to direct it in such be sufficiently clear that the civilization of the Atlantean period was radically different from ours. It will also be understood that the physical nature of an Atlantean was quite different from that of a contemporary man.
The Atlantean took into himself water which could be used by the life force inherent in his own body in a manner quite different from that possible in today's physical body. It was due to this that the Atlantean could consciously employ his physical powers in an entirely different way from a man of today. He had, so to speak, the means to increase the physical powers in himself when he needed them for what he was doing. In order to have an accurate conception of the Atlanteans one must know that their ideas of fatigue and the depletion of forces were quite different from those of present-day man.
An Atlantean settlement — as must be evident from everything we have described — had a character which in no way resembled that of a modern city. In such a settlement everything was, on the contrary, still in alliance with nature. Only a vaguely similar picture is given if one should say that in the first Atlantean periods — about to the middle of the third subrace — a settlement resembled a garden in which the houses were built of trees with artfully intertwined branches. What the work of human hands created at that time grew out of nature. And man himself felt wholly related to nature. Hence his social sense also was quite different from that of today. After all, nature is common to all men. What the Atlantean built up on the basis of nature he considered to be common property just as a man of today thinks it only natural to consider as his private property what his ingenuity, his intelligence have created for him.
One familiar with the idea that the Atlanteans were equipped with such spiritual and physical powers as have been described, will also understand that in still earlier times mankind presented a picture which reminds him in only a few particulars of what he is accustomed to see today. Not only men, but also the surrounding nature has changed enormously in the course of time. Plant and animal forms have become different. All of earthly nature has been subjected to transformations. Once inhabited regions of earth have been destroyed; others have come into existence.
The ancestors of the Atlanteans lived in a region which has disappeared, the main part of which lay south of contemporary Asia. In theosophical writings they are called the Lemurians. After they had passed through various stages of development the greatest part of them declined. These became stunted men, whose descendants still inhabit certain parts of the earth today as so-called savage tribes. Only a small part of Lemurian humanity was capable of further development. From this part the Atlanteans were formed.
Later, something similar again took place. The greatest part of the Atlantean population declined, and from a small portion are descended the so-called Aryans who comprise present-day civilized humanity. According to the nomenclature of the science of the spirit, the Lemurians, Atlanteans and Aryans are root races of mankind. If one imagines that two such root races preceded the Lemurians and that two will succeed the Aryans in the future, one obtains a total of seven. One always arises
from another in the manner just indicated with respect to the Lemurians, Atlanteans, and Aryans. Each root race has physical and mental characteristics which are quite different from those of the preceding one. While, for example, the Atlanteans especially developed memory and everything connected with it, at the present time it is the task of the Aryans to develop the faculty of thought and all that belongs to it.
In each root race various stages must also be gone through. There are always seven of these. In the beginning of a period identified with a root race, its principal characteristics are in a youthful condition; slowly they attain maturity and finally enter a decline. The population of a root race is thereby divided into seven sub-races. But one must not imagine that one subrace immediately disappears when a new one develops. Each one may maintain itself for a long time while others are developing beside it. Thus there are always populations which show different stages of development living beside each other on earth.
The first subrace of the Atlanteans developed from a very advanced part of the Lemurians who had a high evolutionary potential. The faculty of memory appeared only in its rudiments among the Lemurians, and then only in the last period of their development. One must imagine that while a Lemurian could form ideas of what he was experiencing, he could not preserve these ideas. He immediately forgot what he had represented to himself Nevertheless, that he lived in a certain civilization, that, for example, he had tools, erected buildings and so-forth — this he owed not to his own powers of conception, but to a mental force in him, which was instinctive. However, one must not imagine this to have been the present-day instinct of animals, but one of a different kind.
Theosophical writings call the first subrace of the Atlanteans that of the Rmoahals. The memory of this race was primarily directed toward vivid sense impressions. Colors which the eye had seen, sounds which the ear had heard, had a long after-effect in the soul. This was expressed in the fact that the Rmoahals developed feelings which their Lemurian ancestors did not yet know. For example, the attachment to what has been experienced in the past is a part of these feelings.
With the development of memory was connected that of language. As long as man did not preserve what was past, a communication of what had been experienced could not take place through the medium of language. Because in the last Lemurian period the first beginnings of memory appeared, at that time it was also possible for the faculty of naming what had been seen and heard to have its inception. Only men who have the faculty of recollection can make use of a name which has been given to something.
The Atlantean period, therefore, is the one in which the development of language took place. With language a bond was established between the human soul and the things outside man. He produced a speech-word inside himself, and this speech-word belonged to the objects of the external world. A new bond is also formed among men by communications through the medium of language. It is true that all this existed in a still youthful form among the Rmoahals, but nevertheless it distinguished them profoundly from their Lemurian forefathers.
The soul powers of these first Atlanteans still possessed something of the forces of nature. These men were more closely related to the beings of nature which surrounded them than were their successors. Their soul powers were more connected with forces of nature than are those of modern man. Thus the speech-word which they produced had something of the power of nature. They not only named things, but in their words was a power over things and also over their fellow-men. The word of the Rmoahals not only had meaning, but also power.
The magic power of words is something which was far truer for those men than it is for men of today. When a Rmoahals man pronounced a word, this word developed a power similar to that of the object it designated. Because of this, words at that time were curative; they could advance the growth of plants, tame the rage of animals, and perform other similar functions. All this progressively decreased in force among the later sub-races of the Atlanteans. One could say that the original fullness of power was gradually lost.
The Rmoahals men felt this plenitude of power to be a gift of mighty nature, and their relationship to the latter had a religious character. For them language was something especially sacred. The misuse of certain sounds, which possessed an important power, was an impossibility. Each man felt that such misuse must cause him enormous harm. The good magic of such words would have changed into its opposite; that which would have brought blessings if used properly would bring ruin to the author if used criminally. In a kind of innocence of feeling the Rmoahals ascribed their power not so much to themselves as to the divine nature acting within them.
This changed among the second subrace, the so-called Tlavatli peoples. The men of this race began to feel their own personal value. Ambition, a quality unknown to the Rmoahals, made itself felt among them. Memory was in a sense transferred to the conception of communal life. He who could look back upon certain deeds demanded recognition of them from his fellow-men. He demanded that his works be preserved in memory. Based upon this memory of deeds, a group of men who belonged together elected one as leader A kind of regal rank developed.
This recognition was even preserved beyond death. The memory, the remembrance of the ancestors or of those who had acquired merit in life, developed. From this there emerged among some tribes a kind of religious veneration of the deceased, an ancestor cult. This cult continued into much later times and took the most varied forms. Among the Rmoahals a man was still esteemed only to the degree to
which he could command respect at a particular moment through his powers. If someone among them wanted recognition for what he had done in earlier days, he had to demonstrate by new deeds that he still possessed his old power. He had to recall the old works to memory by means of new ones. What had been done was not esteemed for its own sake. Only the second subrace considered the personal character of a man to the point where it took his past life into account in the evaluation of this character.
A further consequence of memory for the communal life of man was the fact that groups of men were formed which were held together by the remembrance of common deeds. Previously the formation of groups depended wholly upon natural forces, upon common descent. Man did not add anything through his own mind to what nature had made of him. Now a powerful personality recruited a number of people for a joint undertaking, and the memory of this joint action formed a social group.
This kind of social communal life became fully developed only among the third subrace, the Toltec. It was therefore the men of this race who first founded what a a state. The leadership, the government of these communities, was transmitted from one generation to the next. The father now gave over to the son what previously survived only in the memory of contemporaries. The deeds of the ancestors were
not to be forgotten by their whole line of descent. What an ancestor had done was esteemed by his descendants.
However, one must realize that in those times men actually had the power to transmit their gifts to their descendants. Education, after all, was calculated to mold life through vivid images. The effectiveness of this education had its foundation in the personal power which emanated from the educator — He did not sharpen the power of thought, but in fact, developed those gifts which were of a more instinctive kind. Through such a system of education the capacities of the father were generally transmitted to the son.
Under such conditions personal experience acquired more and more importance among the third subrace. When one group of men separated from another for the foundation of a new community, it carried along the remembrance of what it had experienced at the old scene. But at the same time there was something in this remembrance which the group did not find suitable for itself, in which it did not feel at ease. Therefore it then tried something new. Thus conditions improved with every one of these new foundations.
It was only natural that what was better was imitated. These are the facts which explain the development of those flourishing communities in the period of the third subrace, described in theosophic literature. The personal experiences which were acquired found support from those who were initiated into the eternal laws of spiritual development. Powerful rulers themselves were initiated, so that personal ability might have full support. Through his personal ability man slowly prepares himself for initiation. He must first develop his powers from below in order that the enlightenment from above can be given to him. In this way the initiated kings and leaders of the Atlanteans came into being. Enormous power was in their hands, and they were greatly venerated.
But in this fact also lay the reason for decline and decay. The development of memory led to the pre- eminent power of a personality. Man wanted to count for something through his power. The greater the power became, the more he wanted to exploit it for himself. The ambition which had developed turned into marked selfishness. Thus the misuse of these powers arose. When one considers the capabilities of the Atlanteans resulting from their mastery of the life force, one will understand that this misuse inevitably had enormous consequences. A broad power over nature could be put at the service of personal egotism.
This was accomplished in full measure by the fourth subrace, the Primal Turanians. The members of this race, who were instructed in the mastery of the above-mentioned powers, often used them in order to satisfy their selfish wishes and desires. But used in such a manner, these powers destroy each other in their reciprocal effects. It is as if the feet were stubbornly to carry a man forward, while his torso wanted to go backward.
Such a destructive effect could only be halted through the development of a higher faculty in man. This was the faculty of thought. Logical thinking has a restraining effect on selfish personal wishes. The origin of logical thinking must be sought among the fifth subrace, the Primal Semites. Men began to go beyond a mere remembrance of the past and to compare different experiences. The faculty of judgment developed. Wishes and appetites were regulated in accordance with this faculty of
judgment. One began to calculate, to combine. One learned to work with thoughts. If previously one had abandoned oneself to every desire, now one first asked whether thought could approve this desire. While the men of the fourth subrace rushed wildly toward the satisfaction of their appetites, those of the fifth began to listen to an inner voice. This inner voice checks the appetites, although it cannot destroy the claims of the selfish personality.
Thus the fifth subrace transferred the impulses for action to within the human being. Man wishes to come to terms within himself as to what he must or must not do. But what thus was won within, with respect to the faculty of thought, was lost with respect to the control of external natural forces. With this combining thought mentioned above, one can master only the forces of the mineral world, not the life force. The fifth subrace therefore developed thought at the expense of control of the life force. But it was just through this that it produced the germ of the further development of mankind. New personality, self-love, even complete selfishness could grow freely; for thought alone which works wholly within, and can no longer give direct orders to nature, is not capable of producing such devastating effects as the previously misused powers. From this fifth subrace the most gifted part was selected which survived the decline of the fourth root race and formed the germ of the fifth, the Aryan race, whose mission is the complete development of the thinking faculty.
The men of the sixth subrace, the Akkadians, developed the faculty of thought even further than the fifth. They differed from the so-called Primal Semites in that they employed this faculty in a more comprehensive sense than the former.
It has been said that while the development of the faculty of thought prevented the claims of the selfish personality from having the same devastating effects as among the earlier races, these claims were not destroyed by it. The Primal Semites at first arranged their personal circumstances as their faculty of thought directed. Intelligence took the place of mere appetites and desires. The conditions of life changed.
If preceding races were inclined to acknowledge as leader one whose deeds had impressed themselves deeply upon their memory, or who could look back upon a life of rich memories, this role was now conferred upon the intelligent. If previously that which lived in a clear remembrance was decisive, one now regarded as best what was most convincing to thought. Under the influence of memory one formerly held fast to a thing until one found it to be inadequate, and in that case it was quite natural that he who was in a position to remedy a want could introduce an innovation. But as a result of the faculty of thought, a fondness for innovations and changes developed.
Each wanted to put into effect what his intelligence suggested to him. Turbulent conditions therefore began to prevail under the fifth subrace, and in the sixth they led to a feeling of the need to bring the obdurate thinking of the individual under general laws. The splendor Of the communities of the third subrace was based on the fact that common memories brought about order and harmony. In the sixth, this order had to be brought about by thought-out laws. Thus it is in this sixth subrace that one must look for the origin of regulations of justice and law.
During the third subrace, the separation of a group of men took place only when they were forced out of their community so to speak, because they no felt at ease in the conditions prevailing as a result of memory In the sixth this was considerably different. The calculating faculty of thought sought the new as such; it spurred men to enterprises and new foundations. The Akkadians were therefore an enterprising people with an inclination to colonization. It was commerce, especially, which nourished the waxing faculty of thought and judgment.
Among the seventh subrace, the Mongols, the faculty of thought was also developed. But characteristics of the earlier sub-races, especially of the fourth, remained present in them to a much higher degree than in the fifth and sixth. They remained faithful to the feeling for memory. And thus they reached the conviction that what is oldest is also what is most sensible and can best defend itself against the faculty of thought.
It is true that they also lost the mastery over the life forces, but what developed in them as the thinking faculty also possessed something of the natural might of this life force. Indeed they had lost the power over life, but they never lost their direct, naive faith in it. This force had become their god, in whose behalf they did everything they considered right. Thus they appeared to the neighboring peoples as if possessed by this secret force, and they surrendered themselves to it in blind trust. Their descendants in Asia and in some parts of Europe manifested and still manifest much of this quality.
The faculty of thought planted in men could only attain its full value in relation to human development when it received a new impetus in the fifth root race. The fourth root race, after all, could only put this faculty at the service of that to which it was educated through the gift of memory. The fifth alone reached life conditions for which the proper tool is the ability to think.

Πέμπτη 30 Ιανουαρίου 2020

The Ripley scroll for you


The Ripley scroll for you

Υπάρχει η δυνατότητα να αγοράσετε τον διάσημο κύλινδρο σε υψηλή ανάλυση και φωτογραφικό χαρτί μήκους τριών μέτρων κατόπιν προ παραγγελίας, όποιος ενδιαφέρεται μπορεί να μου στείλει ένα μήνυμα εδώ soundzgreg@yahoo.co.uk. 





Τρίτη 31 Δεκεμβρίου 2019

Οι Ροδοσταυρικές επιστολές του Karl von Eckartshausen (1752-1803)


Οι Ροδοσταυρικές επιστολές του Karl von Eckartshausen (1752-1803)

Δημόσια ομιλία

Οι Ροδοσταυρικές επιστολές του Karl von Eckartshausen (1752-1803)

1. Η Θεϊκή Σοφία 
2. Ο Πρακτικός Τρόπος Προσέγγισης του Φωτός

Κυριακή 5 Ιανουαρίου 2020

Ομιλητής G.J.P.

https://www.facebook.com/groups/312675118872629/
http://soundzgreg.blogspot.com/

Ελεύθερη είσοδος

Ελληνικό Μουσείο Μετεωριτών
Ιακωβίδου 27, Άγιος Ελευθέριος - Call 2102011543
http://www.meteoritemuseum.gr/

Με ιδιαίτερη χαρά σήμερα θα σας διαβάσω δυο από τις έξι επονομαζόμενες Ροδοσταυρικές επιστολές, οι οποίες βρέθηκαν στο γραφείο του Eckartshausen μετά τον θάνατό του. 

Οι επιστολές αυτές δεν είναι γνωστές στο κοινό και για αυτό χαίρομαι ιδιαίτερα που για άλλη μια φορά πρωτοστατούμε εδώ στην Ελλάδα. 
Μετά την ανάγνωση τους θα έχουμε την χαρά να τις σχολιάσουμε και να συζητήσουμε μαζί σας όλες αυτές τις μυστικές όψεις για τις οποίες μας μιλάνε, μιας και η γνωστική τους αξία είναι μοναδική.

Η προέλευσή τους μέχρι και σήμερα μας είναι άγνωστη μιας και δεν υπάρχει κανείς αποστολέας πάνω σε αυτά τα γράμματα, όμως στην έκτη από αυτές, μας ρίχνεται ένα μικρό φως όσον αφορά αυτήν την μυστική και άγνωστη αδελφότητα.

''Ο Χριστιανός θεόσοφος Karl von Eckartshausen γεννήθηκε στην Γερμανία στις 28 Ιουνίου 1752 και πέθανε στις 12 Μαΐου 1803.
Ο μυστικιστής, συγγραφέας και φιλόσοφος Karl von Eckartshausen ήταν ένας επιφανής και σημαντικός εκπρόσωπος του πρώιμου γερμανικού ρομαντισμού. 
Το έργο του στη φυσική φιλοσοφία και την χριστιανική θεοσοφία διαβάστηκε και συζητήθηκε από μερικούς από τους πιο γνωστούς Ευρωπαίους συγγραφείς και ποιητές της εποχής του. Στη Γερμανία ο Johann Wolfgang von Goethe, ο Friedrich Schiller, ο Johann Gottfried Herder, όπως επίσης και ο Novalis γνώριζαν το έργο του. Στη Ρωσία, όταν τα έργα του εμφανίστηκαν μεταφρασμένα, αναφέρθηκε στα μυθιστορήματα του Νικολάι Γκόγκολ (Νεκρές Ψυχές) και του Λέοντα Τολστόι (Πόλεμος και Ειρήνη). 
Ο Τσάρος Αλέξανδρος ήταν ένας μανιώδης αναγνώστης των έργων του. Στη Γαλλία, ο Eckartshausen επηρέασε τους σύγχρονους μυστικούς φιλοσόφους και Θεόσοφους επειρεασμένους από το έργο του Μπαίμε  όπως ο Louis-Claude de Saint Martin (1743-1803) και πολλά άλλα μέλη διαφόρων Μαρτινιστικών κύκλων.

Στην εκδήλωση μας αυτή θα έχουμε και όσα βιβλία μας έχουν μείνει. Όπως σας είπα όσοι επιθυμούν να αγοράσουν την νέα έκδοση μας του mutus liber με τα πολύ ενδιαφέροντα σχόλια, και μας το δηλώσουν από πριν, στο soundzgreg@yahoo.co.uk  θα λάβουν σαν δώρο ένα usb με 200 ενδιαφέροντες τίτλους μέσα σε pdf, epub.

Ελπίζουμε στην στήριξη και την συμμετοχή σας.

Καλό νέο χρόνο να έχουμε. 

Παρασκευή 27 Δεκεμβρίου 2019

The Rosicrucian Enlightenment by Frances A. Yates


The Rosicrucian Enlightenment by Frances A. Yates

Chapter 3
John Dee and the Rise of 'Christian Rosenkreuz'

The word ‘Rosicrucian’ is derived from the name ‘Christian Rosencreutz’ or ‘Rose Cross’. The so-called ‘Rosicrucian manifestos’ are two short pamphlets or tracts, first published at Cassel in 1614 and 1615, the long titles of which can be abbreviated as the Fama and the Confessio.1
The hero of the manifestos is a certain ‘Father C.R.C.’ or ‘Christian Rosencreutz’ wh is said to have been the founder of an Order or Fraternity, now revived, and which the manifestos invite others to join. These manifestos aroused immense excitement, and a third  publication,  in  1616,  increased  the  mystery.  This  was  a  strange  alchemical romance, the German title of which translates as The Chemical Wedding of Christian Rosencreutz.  The  hero  of The Chemical Wedding seems also connected with some Order which uses a red cross and red roses as symbols.
The  author  of The Chemical Wedding was certainly Johann Valentin Andreae. The manifestos are undoubtedly related to The Chemical Wedding, though they are probably not by Andreae but by some other person or persons unknown.
Who was this ‘Christian Rose Cross’ who first appears in these publications? Endless are the mystifications and legends which have been woven around this character and his Order. We are going to try to cut a way through to him by quite a new path. But let us begin this chapter with the easier question, ‘Who was Johann Valentin Andreae?’
Johann Valentin Andreae, born in 1586, was a native of Württemberg, the Lutheran state which closely adjoined the Palatinate. His grandfather was a distinguished Lutheran theologian sometimes called ‘the Luther of Württemberg’. Intense interest in the contemporary religious  situation was  the  main inspiration of his  grandson,  Johann Valentin, who also became a Lutheran pastor, but with a liberal interest in Calvinism. In spite of endless disasters, Johann Valentin was supported all his life by hopes of some far-reaching solution of the religious situation. All his activities, whether as a devout Lutheran pastor with socialist interests, or as the propagator of ‘Rosicrucian’ fantasies, were  directed  towards  such  a  hope.  Andreae  was  a  writer  of  promise,  whose imagination was influenced by the travelling English players. Concerning his early life and the influences on him we have authentic information, since he wrote an autobiography.2
From this we learn that in 1601, when he was fifteen, his widowed mother took him to Tübingen so that he might pursue his studies at that famous university of Württemberg. Whilst a student at Tübingen, so he tells us, he made his first juvenile efforts as an author, in about the years 1602 and 1603. 
These efforts included two comedies on the themes of ‘Esther ’ and ‘Hyacinth’, which he states that he wrote ‘in emulation of the English   actors’,   and   a   work   called Chemical   Wedding,   which  he   describes deprecatingly as a ludibrium, or a fiction, or a jest, of little worth.3
Judging by the Chemical Wedding by Andreae which is extant, the work published in 1616 with Christian Rosencreutz as its hero, this early version of the subject would have been a work of alchemical symbolism, using the marriage theme as a symbol of alchemical  processes.  It  cannot  have  been  identical  with  the  published Chemical Wedding of 1616 which contains references to the Rosicrucian manifestos of 1614 and 1615, to the Elector Palatine and his court at Heidelberg, to his wedding to the daughter of James I. The early version of the Chemical Wedding, which is not extant, must have been brought up to date for the publication of 1616. Nevertheless, the lost early version may have provided the core of the work.
We can make a very good guess as to what were the influences and events at Tübingen when Andreae was a student there which inspired these early works. The  reigning  Duke  of  Württemberg  was  Frederick  I,  alchemist,  occultist,  an enthusiastic Anglophil, the ruling passion of whose life had been to establish an alliance with Queen Elizabeth and to obtain the Order of the Garter. He had several times visited England with these aims in view and seems to have been a conspicuous figure.4  The Queen called him ‘cousin Mumpellgart’, which was his family name, and much discussion has centred round the problem of whether the cryptic references in Shakespeare’s Merry Wives of Windsor to ‘cosen garmombles’ and to horses hired at the Garter Inn by retainers of a German duke, might have some reference to Frederick o Württemberg.5 The Queen allowed his election to the Order of the Garter in 1597 bu the actual ceremony of his investiture did not take place until November, 1603, when the Garter was conferred on him in his own capital city of Stuttgart by a special embassy from James I.
Thus  James by this act in the very first year of his reign made a gesture towards continuing the Elizabethan alliance with the German Protestant powers, though in after years he was to deny the hopes thus raised. But in Württemberg in 1603 the reign of the new ruler of England seemed opening most auspiciously for German hopes and there was an outpouring of enthusiasm around the embassy come to confer the Garter on the Duke, and on the English actors who accompanied the embassy.
The Garter ceremony at Stuttgart and the festivities which accompanied it are described by E. Cellius in a Latin account published at Stuttgart in 1605, part of which is quoted i English translation by Elias Ashmole in his history of the Order of the Garter.6
The processions in which the English Garter officials, bearing the insignia of the Order took solemn part with the German dignitaries, made a brilliant impression. The Duke’s appearance was most splendid, so covered with jewels that they cast forth ‘a radiant mixture of divers colours’.7  
One of the English Garter officials was Robert Spenser who is stated by Cellius to have been a relative of the poet.8 The interesting point of this remark is that they had heard of Spenser, and perhaps of his Faerie Queene, at Stuttgart.
Thus magnificently clad, the Duke entered the church where, to the sound of solemn music,  he  was  invested  with the  Order. After  a  sermon,  the  music  was  renewed, consisting of ‘the Voices of two Youths clad in white garments, with wings like Angels, and standing opposite to one another’.9
When the company returned to the hall they partook of the Garter Feast, a banquet which lasted until early the next day. Cellius has some details about the Feast which are not quoted by Ashmole, including mentions of the part in the entertainment provided by
‘English musicians, comedians, tragedians, and most skilful actors’. The English musicians gave a combined concert with the Württemberg musicians, and the English actors added to the hilarity of the banquet by presenting dramas. One of these was the
‘History of Susanna’, which they played ‘with such art of histrionic action and with such dexterity’ that they were greatly applauded and rewarded.10
On later days, the English were conducted to see some of the principal places in the Dukedom, including the  University of Tübingen ‘where they were entertained with Comedies, Musick and other delights’.
Surely the visit of the  Garter  embassy and its  attendant actors  must have been an immensely stimulating and exciting event for the imaginative young student at Tübingen, Johann   Valentin  Andreae?   His Chemical  Wedding  of  1616  is  full  of  brilliant impressions of rich ceremonial and feasts, of some Order, or Orders, and contains fascinating insets of dramatic performances. It becomes more understandable as an artistic product when seen as the result of early English influences on Andreae, both of drama and ceremonial, combining to inspire a new and original imaginative work of art.
The year after the Garter ceremony, in 1604, a very curious work was dedicated to the Duke  of Württemberg.  This  was  the Naometria by Simon Studion, the unpublished manuscript of which is  in the  Landesbibliothek at Stuttgart.11  It is  an apocalyptic-
prophetic work of immense length, using involved numerology based on Biblical descriptions of the measurements of the Temple of Solomon and involved arguments about significant dates in Biblical and European history, leading up to prophecies about dates of future events. The writer is particularly interested in the dates in the life of Henry of Navarre, and the whole composition seems to reflect a secret alliance between Henry, now King of France, James I of Great Britain, and Frederick, Duke o Württemberg. This supposed alliance (of which I have not found evidence elsewhere) is very circumstantially described, and the manuscript even includes several pages of music which are to be sung to verses about the eternal friendship of the Lily (the King of France), the Lion (James of Great Britain), and the Nymph (the Duke of Württemberg).
According to the evidence of Simon Studion, it would therefore seem that there was a secret alliance in 1604 between James, Württemberg, and the King of France, perhaps a following up  of the rapprochement with James through the Garter ceremony of the preceding year. We are still in the early part of James’s reign during which he was still continuing the alliances of the previous reign and working in concert with Navarre, now King of France.
The Naometria is a curious specimen of that mania for prophecy, based on chronology, which was  a  characteristic  obsession of those  times.  It contains, however, a  very interesting and apparently factual account of something which is said to have taken place in 1586.
According to the author of Naometria, there was a meeting at Luneburg on 17 July 1586, between ‘some evangelical Princes and Electors’ and representatives of the King of Navarre, the King of Denmark, and the Queen of England. The object of this meeting i said to have been to form an ‘evangelical’ league of defence against the Catholic League (then working up in France to prevent the accession of Henry of Navarre to the throne o France). This league was called a ‘Confederatio Militiae Evangelicae’.12
Now, according to some early students of the Rosicrucian mystery, Simon Studion’s Naometria and the ‘Militia Evangelica’ which it describes, is a basic source for the Rosicrucian movement.13 A. E. Waite, who had examined the manuscript, believed that a crudely shaped rose design, with a cross in the centre, contained in the Naometria, is the first example of Rosicrucian rose and cross symbolism.14  I cannot say that I am altogether convinced of the importance of this so-called rose, but the idea that the Rosicrucian movement was rooted in some kind of alliance of Protestant sympathizers, formed to counteract the Catholic League, is one which would accord well with the interpretations to be advanced in this book. The date 1586 for the formation of this ‘Militia Evangelica’ would take one back to the reign of Queen Elizabeth, to the year o Leicester ’s intervention in the Netherlands, to the year of Philip Sidney’s death, to the idea of the formation of a Protestant League which was so dear to Sidney and to Joh Casimir of the Palatinate.
The problems raised by Simon Studion and his Naometria are too complicated to be entered  upon  in  detail  here,  but  I  would  be  inclined  to  agree  that  this  Stuttgart manuscript certainly is of importance to students of the Rosicrucian mystery. What encourages one in this view is the fact that Johann Valentin Andreae undoubtedly knew t h e Naometria  for  he  mentions  it  in his  work Turris  Babel,15  published  in 1619. Andreae is here interested, not in any past dates mentioned in the Naometria, but in its dates for future events, its prophecies. Simon Studion is very emphatic, in his repetitive way, that the year 1620 (remember that he is writing in 1604) will be highly significant for it will  see the end of the reign of Antichrist in the downfall  of the  Pope and Mahomet. This collapse will be continued in following years and about the year 1623 the  millennium  will  begin.  Andreae  is  very  obscure  in  what  he  says  about  the prophecies of Naometria, which he links with those of the Abbot Joachim, St Brigid Lichtenberg,  Paracelsus,  Postel,  and  other illuminati.  It  is  however  possible  that prophecies of this type may actually have influenced historical events, may have helped to decide the Elector Palatine and the enthusiasts behind him to make that rash decision to accept the Bohemian crown in the belief that the millennium was at hand.
The obscure movements glimpsed through the study of the Duke of Württemberg and the Garter and the mysteries of Naometria belong to the early years of the century when the Protestant Union was being formed in Germany and the Kings of France and Englan were hoped for as its supporters. In those earlier years, James I appeared sympathetic to these movements. The assassination of the King of France in 1610, on the eve of making some important intervention in Germany, shattered the hopes of the activists for a while and altered the balance of European affairs.  James, however, appeared to be still continuing the old policies. In 1612 he joined the Union of Protestant Princes, the head of which was now the young Elector Palatine; in the same year he engaged his daughter Elizabeth to Frederick, and in 1613 the famous wedding took place, with its apparent promise of support by Great Britain for the head of the German Protestant Union, th Elector Palatine.
Now at the time of the height of the alliance, before James I had begun his backing-ou process from it, the energetic Christian of Anhalt began to work towards building up the Elector Palatine as the ideal head of the anti-Hapsburg forces in Europe. Earlier hoped for leaders had disappeared; Henry of France had been assassinated; Henry, Prince o Wales, had died. The lot fell upon the young Elector Palatine.
Anhalt was generally held responsible for Frederick’s unfortunate Bohemian adventure, and  it was  against Anhalt that propaganda  after  its  disastrous  failure  was  largely addressed.16 He had many contacts in Bohemia and it would seem that it may have been through  his  persuasive  efforts  that  the  Bohemian  rebels  were  influenced  towards offering the crown to Frederick. The figure of Anhalt was an important, a dominating influence, in the years when the Bohemian adventure was working towards its climax and it is therefore essential to take into account the nature of this man’s interests, and the nature of his connections in Bohemia.
Theologically speaking, Christian of Anhalt was an enthusiastic Calvinist, but like so many other German Protestant princes at this time he was deeply involved in mystical and Paracelsist movements. He was the patron of Oswald Croll, Cabalist, Paracelsist and alchemist. And his Bohemian connections were of a similar character. He was a close friend of Peter Wok of Rosenberg,17  or Rozmberk, a wealthy Bohemian noble with vast estates around Trebona in southern Bohemia, a liberal of the old Rudolphine school, and a patron of alchemy and the occult.
Anhalt’s Bohemian contacts were of a kind to bring him within the sphere of a very remarkable current of influences from England which arose out of the visit to Bohemia of John Dee, and his associate, Edward Kelley. As is well known, Dee and Kelley were in Prague in 1583, when Dee tried to interest the Emperor Rudolph II in his farreachin imperialist mysticism and his vast range of studies. The nature of Dee’s work is now better known through the recent book by Peter French. Dee, whose influence in England had been so profoundly important, who had been the teacher of Philip Sidney and his friends, had had the opportunity of forming a following in Bohemia, though we have, as yet, little means of studying this. The main centre for the Dee influences in Bohemia would have been Trebona, which he and Kelley had made their headquarters after the first visit to Prague.18  Dee lived at Trebona, as the guest of Villem Rozmberk, until 1589, when he returned to England. Villem Rozmberk was the elder brother of the Peter who was Anhalt’s friend and who inherited the Trebona estates on his brother ’s death.19
Given the bent of Anhalt’s mind and the nature of his interests, it is certain that the Dee influences would have reached him. Moreover, it is probable that the ideas and outlook originally emanating from Dee, the English and Elizabethan philosopher, were used by Anhalt  in building up  the  Elector  Palatine  in  Bohemia  as  one  having marvellous resources of English influence behind him.
An influence from Dee had been spreading into Germany from Bohemia much earlier According  to  the  notes  about  Dee  by  Elias  Ashmole  in  his Theatrum  Chemicum Britannicum  (1652),  Dee’s  journey through Germany in 1589,  on his  return from Bohemia  to  England,  was  somewhat  sensational.  He  passed  near  those  territories which, twenty-five years later, were to be the scene of the outbreak of the Rosicrucian movement. The Landgrave of Hesse presented his compliments to Dee, who, in return ‘presented  him with  Twelve  Hungarian  Horses,  that  he  bought  at  Prague  for  his journey’.20 Dee also made contact at this stage of his journey home with his disciple, Edward Dyer (who had been Philip Sidney’s closest friend) who was going to Denmar as ambassador and who ‘the yeare before had been at Trebona, and carried back letters from the Doctor (Dee) to Queen Elizabeth’.21 Dee must have made a great impression in those parts, both as an immensely learned man and as someone at the centre of great affairs.
Ashmole states that on 27 June 1589, when at Bremen, Dee was visited by ‘that famous Hermetique Philosopher, Dr Henricus Khunrath of Hamburgh’2. 2 The influence of Dee is in fact apparent in Khunrath’s extraordinary work, ‘The Amphitheater of Eternal Wisdom’  (Pl.  10b),  published  at  Hanover  in  1609.23   Dee’s  ‘monas’  symbol,  the complex sign which he expounded in his Monas hieroglyphica (Pl. 10a) (published in 1564 with a dedication to the Emperor Maximilian II) as expressive of his peculia form  of  alchemical  philosophy,  can  be  seen  in  one  of  the  illustrations  in  the ‘Amphitheatre’, and both Dee’s Monas and his Aphorisms are mentioned in Khunrath’s text.24 Khunrath’s ‘Amphitheatre’ forms a link between a philosophy influenced by Dee and the philosophy of the Rosicrucian manifestos. In Khunrath’s work we meet with the characteristic phraseology of the manifestos, the everlasting emphasis on macrocosm and microcosm, the stress on Magia, Cabala, and Alchymia as in some way combining to form a religious philosophy which promises a new dawn for mankind.

Πέμπτη 26 Δεκεμβρίου 2019

A. Chymische Hochzeit (The Tessera of Antilia by Donald R. Dickson)


A. Chymische Hochzeit 

CHAPTER THREE 
ANDREAE AND THE FABLE OF THE ROSICRUCIAN BROTHERHOOD 

A. Chymische Hochzeit 

Too often critics treat the Chymische Hochzeit: Christiani Rosenkreutz Anno 1459 as if it were written in response to the Fama and Confessio, when we know that Andreae composed it before, circa 1605, during the interval between his undergraduate and theological studies.11 Furthermore nothing about the published version of 1616-which in fact ends in mid-sentence with an indication that two quarto leaves are missing-suggests that the manuscript had been revised at all.12 We ought, therefore, to place the tale once again in its originary textual moment and consider it in relationship to the Besold-Hess circles. Given the alchemical interests of his parents and his wide reading, it is likely that Andreae was familiar with the idea of the chemical wedding long before he met Besold or Hess. The major sources would have also been readily available in Besold's library: Paracelsus, Agrippa, Khunrath, Figulus, all available in the recently published Theatrum Chemicum (1602). The title character Christian Rosencreutz (spelled with a k only in the title) was most likely Andreae's own creation since the name, a symbol of the central idea of his Christian philosophy, does not appear anywhere before 1605. The rose-cross came from his family's coat of arms, which derived from Luther's. Andreae's originality was in uniting the age-old symbols of the rose, the cross, and the wedding as a symbol of the union of the Lutheran reformation and Christian hermeticism. Closer examination of the Chymische Hochzeit will also show that it contains in brief one of the key ideas that motivated Andreae and the Hess-Besold circles-the belief that a spiritual elite could be formed to serve in times of need. 
Ezechiel Foxcroft tided his translation appropriately TL· Hermetick Romance (London, published in 1690), for Andreae's work was very much in the mode of the literary romance with all its attendant marvels. The controlling narrative is a pilgrimage to a royal wedding, which is also an allegory for alchemical and spiritual regeneration. The central episode of the chemical marriage is the creation of a homunculus, a feat commonly attributed to Paracelsus, which he described in his De homunculis. The rich texture of Andreae's work can only be sketched here.13 
After evening prayers on Maundy Thursday, the narrator, Christian Rosencreutz, is greeted by a lady, identified in a marginal note as Praeconissa, the conveyor of the proclamation of the Gospel, who announces a royal wedding. Her appearance confirms a vision he had had seven years before. That night he dreams he is cast into a dungeon filled with prisoners who can only escape by catching a rope thrown down seven times; on the seventh cast, because he is fortunately standing on the stone of the word (Psalm 61:2), he at last is able to extricate himself. When he awakes, recognizing the pre­monitory quality of the dream, he dresses in a white linen coat, girds himself with a red ribbon cross-ways, sticks four roses in his hat, and sets out. The narrative of the first three days concerns his pilgrimage and trials; the last four days describe the royal death, resurrection, and "wedding" that he witnesses.14 
His experiences on the second and third days recapitulate the action of his dream. From a tablet found on a cedar tree, he learns that he must decide which path to take; when a raven attacks a dove and he rushes to protect it, the decision is unwittingly made. He approaches a royal portal, presents his invitation and calls himself a "Brother of the Red-Rosie Cross."15 Once admitted to the castle, he meets many other invited guests who vaunt their abilities, accomplishments, and worthiness. Eventually, a maiden in snow white robes proclaims that each will be "weighed" the following morning. Only a few choose to spend the night in penance with Rosencreutz. On the third morning, only eight can meet the challenge of the golden scales, which are matched with seven massive weights, one for each of the virtues. The heralds specially honor Rosencreutz, who is allowed to grant membership to one not quite qualified; all are given a golden fleece adorned with a flying lion and invited to the wedding. They pass into the garden to witness the punishments of those who failed. Afterwards a unicorn appears; a lion breaks a sword in two and throws the pieces in a fountain; a dove brings an olive branch; and the guests wash their hands and heads in the fountain. Rosencreutz is allowed to visit the royal sepulcher, where the glorious phoenix stands, and the royal library. At a banquet that evening each of the guests proposes a riddle, all of which have an alchemical interpretation; the Lady also gives a mathematical cipher for her name, solved by Rosencreutz (and later by Leibniz): she is Alchima.16 Finally the Queen, attended by four virgins, comes in and prays.
The tableau by the fountain that greets the chosen ones on the fourth day has been significantly altered, for instead of a sword the Lion bears a tablet that translated reads: "Hermes the Prince. After so many losses sustained by mankind, by the counsel of God: with the help of art, a healthful medicine is made, here I flow. Let him who is able drink from me: let him wash, who wishes: let him disturb me who dares: Drink, Brothers, and Live."17 Here the brotherhood bathes and drinks before viewing a spectacle that foreshadows all that will be viewed in the remaining four days: a princess, captured by a Moor, is rescued and betrothed to the king's son, but begins to act wantonly and consents to be the Moor's concubine; the young King battles for his betrothed despite her apparent unfaithfulness and appears to die at the hands of the Moors; after he is revived, they are wed. All proclaim, VIVAT SPONSUS, VIVAT SPONSA. After the spectacle, they are feted and another, far more complex, series of mysteries begins that reenacts this same drama of death, rebirth, and marriage. The events also correspond to the alchemical death, rebirth, and marriage in the great work.18 After six royal persons are beheaded by a Moor, the Virgin (Alchimia) tells them, 
"The Life of these standeth now in your hands, and in case you follow me, Ms Death shall make many alive"19 
A fleet of royal ships conveys the coffins across a lake to a laboratory where a solution is made from the corpses; in a golden globe a snow white egg is produced that hatches into a blue bird that is beheaded and cremated. From these ashes a homunculus and homunucula are fashioned, which are brought to life as the new king and queen, who then sail home for their wedding feast. The brotherhood is clothed in yellow habits with golden fleeces and declared Knights of the Golden Stone; they also bear a white ensign with a red cross just as Rosencreutz was arrayed when he ventured forth. At the banquet the articles or leges of this brotherhood are given:

I. You my Lords the Knights shall swear, that you shall at no time ascribe your order either unto any Devil or Spirit, but only to God your Creator, and his hand-maid Nature. 
II. That you will Abominate all Whoredom, Incontinency and Uncleanness, and not defile your order with such Vices. 
III. That you through your Talents will be ready to assist all that are worthy, and have need of them. 
IV That you desire not to employ this honor to worldly Pride and high Authority.
V. That you shall not be willing to live longer than God will have you.20 

Having been invested, the pilgrim at last reveals his true name, Christian Rosencreutz, as he inscribes it in the book of life. Late in his life Andreae wrote slightingly about this youthful work, even amazed that it had drawn such attention or was so popular (three editions were issued within twelve months). He wrote, "The Nuptiae Chymicae survives in contrast [to his writings that did not], with its fecund brood of monstrosities: a ludibnum that you may wonder was valued by some and explicated with such subde ingenuity, and certainly this shows the inanity of the curious."21 The story of the "invisible" appearance of the brotherhood in Paris in 1623 as well known and can serve as an example of the inanitatem to which Andreae referred, as can the hundreds of responses and commentaries to the Rosicrucian manifestos, which are mostly of the subtly ingenious kind that Andreae derided.
A full-scale analysis of the Chymische Hochzeit lies beyond the scope of this study, but a few key points need to be set forth. First, in the passage quoted above, Andreae described the work as a ludibnum. As a "jest" or "mockery" it satirizes deceitful alchemists and other fools-i.e., those who seek entry to the wedding but are found unworthy - while extolling the spiritual renewal possible through esoteric alchemy. One of his main purposes, as several critics have noted, is to advance a Christian purpose.22 Secondly, Andreae's romance is a youthful work filled with wit and humor. Especially noteworthy is the comic character of Alchimia, who tries to seduce Christian and whose actions lend a light, amusing character to the whole. The narrative is studded with enigmas and riddles that demonstrate the young author's wit and abilities. One tour de force involves the Virgins' "premeditated device" to cozen the brotherhood into thinking they are being given bedmates for the evening. Andreae's mathematical prowess is displayed in the construction of a circular arrangement in which Virgins end up paired with Virgins, despite the direction in which the counting proceeds.23 Finally, and most importantly for this study, the Chymische Hochzeit describes the kind of elite brotherhood to which Andreae and his associates in Tübingen aspired. Clothed in special habits and bearing a white ensign with a red cross, purified by symbolic trials, the Knights of the Golden Stone pledged obedience to God and loyalty to their ideals, vowing to assist all that were worthy of their talents. The similarities with the brotherhoods described in the Fama and Confessio are striking. The fable of Christian Rosencreutz, thus, is a composite of Chaucerian ernest and game, the risible and the grotesque, whose purpose was to ridicule the deceitful while proclaiming the spiritual renewal possible through a Christian hermeticism (though no specifics are offered about this mystical path).24 Its author was just nineteen, and while his youth was evident in the loose narrative and the fanciful details, so too were the Utopian aspirations that would characterize his life's work.

Δευτέρα 16 Δεκεμβρίου 2019

A Naturall Chymicall Symbolum Or a short confession of Henry Kunwrath


A Naturall Chymicall Symbolum Or a short confession of Henry Kunwrath

A part of the small of the 'The Short Confession of Khunrath'

I Doctor Kunwrath through Divine wisdomme have written thys
the 12 of December about the houre of 8 in the Evening Anno Dm 1597.

Instigated
By the allpowerfull spirit.
Praise you the Lord, Praise you the Lord.
Praise you they Lord.
Defiance be to the Devill.
Amen.

The wise have considered but Fooles have not regarded
therefore are iustly despised of Wisdome and her Children.
He yt can understand let him understand.
It is difficult & hard to teach fooles understanding.
And he yt is unwise let him leame; if not hold his peace.


A Philosophical1 short songe
of the incorporating of the Spirit of the Lord in Salt [Gen: 1,2 moved on ye face of ye waters.]

Spirit Divine, blest be thy state,                    [Ruach elohim Gen: 1,2.]
That art in Salt incorporate
And in the Worlds true virgin wombe           [in Earth voyde & empty
A pure Quintessence art becornrne.                Wisd: 1,7, Gen: 1,2.]
Lord have mercy upon us.

Gods wondrous eternal power,
Man in this world may discover,
Who wth the greate worlds flesh & blood,
Clad itselfe for our Eternal1 good.

Who earst the whole world didst surround,   [In ye beginning of
Now in old Chaos seede art found                   ye world not before a
Soe art become a body small                           seede of all things]
Susteyning all things naturall.
Lord have mercy upon us.

This is the greate Light of Nature
That giving the world a new Lustre
And shining in ye darksome night
To make us true Children of Light
Lord have mercy upon us.

Thou Spirit of God true God art
Yet in the world a stranger wert
Which led us out from Errors place
And made us heyres of Natures grace.
Lord have mercy upon us.

On Earth he was in meane Consort           [In a poore meane low
Us in great mercy to Comfort                     despised forme]
And make us rich in true wisdome
That like new borne Babes we become.
Lord have mercy upon us.

All this on us good God bestow
Then Lord shall we they greate workes shew
And wisdomes Babes their voyce shall raise
Singing to thy Eternal1 praise.
Lord have mercy upon us.

Reproach to the Gainsayers.

Doctor Kunwrath faciebat
23 Decembris. Anno 1597. octava vespertina.

From Hermetic Journal

Τετάρτη 4 Δεκεμβρίου 2019

Εμφάνιση και χρήση των συμβόλων (Πεντάγραμμο 18ο έτος, αρ. 2, 1996)


Εμφάνιση και χρήση των συμβόλων

Κατά αρχήν το σύμβολο είναι ένα ερμητικό σημείο που χαρακτηρίζει την σχέση ανάμεσα στο 'πάνω' και στο 'κάτω'. Είναι η συνάντηση ανάμεσα σε δυο κόσμους : τον ανώτερο και τον κατώτερο, το εξωτερικό σχέδιο και το υπόβαθρο. το συνειδητό και το ασυνείδητο, την ιδέα και το επιφαινόμενο. Τα αρχαία θρησκευτικά σύμβολα αναφέρονταν στην αλήθεια και στην οδό που οδηγεί σε αυτήν.

Χάρη στα σύμβολα μπορεί να βιώσει κανείς συνειδητά ορισμένους περιορισμούς και ενδεχομένως ακόμη να τους ξεπεράσει. Για αυτό και χρησιμοποιούνται σε όλες τις περιοχές της ζωής : θρησκευτικές, επιστημονικές, καλλιτεχνικές.
Είναι μέσα που έχουν προορισμό να βοηθήσουν τα ανθρώπινα όντα να συνειδητοποιήσουν τα όρια τους.
Και αν αναγνωρίσουν αυτά τα όρια, τότε τα σύμβολα μπορούν να τους βοηθήσουν να τα υπερβούν.
'Όπως κάτω, έτσι και πάνω' : οι δομές οι κάτω αντιστοιχούν με τις δομές τις πάνω και το επακόλουθο είναι πως ότι είναι κάτω μπορεί να συμβολίζει αυτό που είναι και πάνω.
Η λέξη σύμβολο προέρχεται από την Ελληνική λέξη 'συμβάλλω' ένα σύμβολο είναι λοιπόν η αναπαράσταση μιας έννοιας ή μιας διαδικασίας στην οποία μοιάζει , θα λέγαμε η δομή του συμβόλου.
Η έννοια του συμβόλου έχει χρησιμοποιηθεί μεταξύ άλλων για να δείξει ότι τα δυο ήμισυ ενός δαχτυλιδιού ή μιας πλάκας που είχαν σκοπίμως σπάσει, έχουν συνενωθεί και πάλι.
Δείχνοντας αυτό το μισό, φίλοι, σύζυγοι, παιδιά αποδείκνυαν ότι ήσαν σαφώς συνδεδεμένοι ή συγγενείς.
Αυτή η σημασία της λέξης σύμβολο : η ένωση δυο στοιχείων χωρισμένων τα οποία έχουν ωστόσο συγγένεια δείχνει λοιπόν σαφώς την προσέγγιση δυο πραγμάτων σε ένα και αυτό επίπεδο.Από εκεί προέρχεται η σημερινή του έννοια : να δείχνει ότι κάτι κατώτερο μπορεί να εκφράζει κάτι ανώτερο. Κατά συνέπεια το σύμβολο υπερβαίνει ένα σύνορο το οποίο είναι έτσι δυνατόν να το αναγνωρίσουμε συνειδητά. Με αυτήν την έννοια μια αλληγορία δεν είναι σύμβολο, αλλά είναι μια συμβολική ή εικονική αναπαράσταση, Μια έννοια όπως 'η δικαιοσύνη' παριστάνεται αλληγορικά από μια γυναίκα με δεμένα μάτια που κρατάει μια ζυγαριά ή για τον 'θάνατο' οπλισμένη με ένα δρεπάνι. Εδώ χρησιμοποιούνται στοιχεία ενός όλου τα οποία δεν είναι της ίδιας φύσης αλλά εκφράζουν την ίδια ιδέα με διαφορετικούς τρόπους. Η αλληγορία δεν υπαινίσσεται την ιδέα ενός αποφασιστικού ορίου το οποίο μπορεί να επιτευχθεί και ενδεχομένως να ξεπεραστεί.

Ψυχολογικά σύμβολα

Η σημασία των κρυμμένων κόσμων πίσω από τα σύμβολα εξαρτάται από το επίπεδο από το οποίο ερχόμαστε σε επαφή.
Για παράδειγμα στην ζώνη του συνόρου ανάμεσα στο συνειδητό και το υποσυνείδητο, ή ανάμεσα στον κόσμο της ύλης και την αιθερική ζώνη στο υπερπέραν, ή ανάμεσα στην κατώτερη και την ανώτερη φύση. Στην πρώτη ζώνη πρόκειται για ψυχολογικές αναπαραστάσεις που προέρχονται από το ασυνείδητο και βρίσκονται συσχετισμένες με το ασυνείδητο και το άγνωστο τμήμα της ψυχής. Είναι εκφράσεις εσωτερικών εμπειριών που μπορούν να γίνουν αντιληπτές μέσω των αισθήσεων. Στην ψυχολογία του βάθους  τέτοια σύμβολα συνιστούν ενεργούς κρίκους ανάμεσα στις ασυνείδητες δυνάμεις της ψυχής και την συνείδηση. Τόσο τα ατομικά όσο και τα συλλογικά συμπλέγματα μπορούν να παίξουν συμβολικό ρόλο μέσα στις λέξεις, στις πράξεις και τα όνειρα.
Σε αυτό το σημείο, τα σύμβολα θεωρούνται γενικά σαν εργαλεία κατανόησης του εσωτερικού όντος καθώς και του περιβάλλοντος κόσμου.
Δυνάμεις από την αστρική ασυνείδητη περιοχή γεννούν μέσα στο όνειρο εικόνες τις οποίες μπορεί μερικές φορές να ξαναζήσει κανείς συνειδητά αφού ξυπνήσει.
Είναι δυνατόν να αποκαλύψουν σε ποια 'οριακή κατάσταση' βρίσκεται κανείς, να δείξουν την αιτία της πίεσης και της κρίσης που απειλεί. Ακολουθώντας αυτήν την οδό συμβαίνει η ψυχολογική ένταση να ελαττωθεί και να λάβει κανείς ενδείξεις για μια πιο ισορροπημένη ανάπτυξη της προσωπικότητας. Αλλά αυτό εγκυμονεί επίσης κινδύνους τους οποίους δεν θα μπορούσε να αντιμετωπίσει κανείς. Για παράδειγμα, η προβολή ενός συναισθήματος συνειδητής ενοχής σε ένα άλλο άτομο, το οποίο θα επωμιστεί έτσι το λάθος για το οποίο το άτομο που έσφαλε δεν θέλει να αναλάβει την ευθύνη.
Αυτός είναι ο μεγάλος κίνδυνος που εμφανίζεται όταν ένα σύμβολο θεωρείται ότι είναι η ίδια η πραγματικότητα. Είναι ένας αναπόφευκτος κίνδυνος όταν βιώνει κανείς την εμπειρία του ορίου, κυρίως όταν πλησιάζει το σύνορο ανάμεσα στο συνειδητό και το ασυνείδητο, τον κόσμο της ύλης και τον κόσμο των νεκρών, την θνητή φύση και της αθάνατη φύση.
Ο Καρλ Γιουνγκ οικτίρει αυτήν την επικίνδυνη κατάσταση :  'Από τότε που τα υπέροχα σύμβολα μας αμαυρώθηκαν, υπάρχει μια άγνωστη και μυστική ζωή μέσα στο ασυνείδητο του ανθρώπου. Για αυτό υπάρχει η ψυχολογία στις μέρες μας, και μιλάμε για το ασυνείδητο. Αν τα σύμβολα είχαν παραμείνει δυναμικά και ενεργά, αυτό δεν θα ήταν απαραίτητο΄Γιατί τέτοια σύμβολα γεννιούνται από το πνεύμα που προέρχεται άνωθεν'.

Τα γνωστικά σύμβολα

Ποια είναι ακόμα στην εποχή μας η έννοια αυτών των υπέρτατων συμβόλων για τα οποία μιλάει ο Γιουνγκ, αφού δεν δείχνουν πλέον με ξεκάθαρο τρόπο το υπέρτατο' που βρίσκεται στο υπόβαθρο, τον Θεό, την γνώση.
Ενώ οι έννοιες και οι ορισμοί μπορούν να εξηγήσουν τα γεγονότα, και να περιγράψουν με κάθε βεβαιότητα συγκεκριμένες καταστάσεις, η υπεραφθονία του άμετρου, πολυδιάστατου βάθους, της Θεϊκής πραγματικότητας εκφράζεται με σύμβολα.
Ο γήινος άνθρωπος έχει το πολύ-πολύ την δυνατότητα να προσεγγίσει τον κόσμο που βρίσκεται στο υπόβαθρο.
Τέτοια σύμβολα δεν μπορούν παρά να δείχνουν την ύπαρξη μιας πραγματικότητας που είναι ξένη προς την συνηθισμένη ανθρώπινη συνείδηση, η οποία επομένως δεν έχει πρόσβαση σε αυτήν.
Έτσι το σύμβολο αποτελεί ένα σύνδεσμο ανάμεσα στον Θεό και την προσωπικότητα χάρη στον οποίο μπορεί κανείς να υψωθεί πάνω από τα ίδια του τα όρια.
Το σύμβολο αναφέρεται στην αναμφισβήτητη δύναμη που εμπερικλείεται στο Θεϊκό πεδίο αλλά δεν εκφράζετε ποτέ μέσα στην ύλη. Χάρη σε αυτόν τον σύνδεσμο με το Θεϊκό, ο γνωστικός συμβολισμός υπερβαίνει το φθαρτό κόσμο, ακόμη και αν αυτός ο κόσμος περιείχε ακόμη όψεις με αξία, ωραίες και αληθινές. Για παράδειγμα μια λαξευμένη πέτρα διαβρώνεται, αλλά ο Χριστός, ο πάνω στον οποίο οικοδομείται ο άγιος μικρόκοσμος είναι αμετάβλητος.

Τα υπέρτατα σύμβολα είναι αποκαλύψεις

Πως τα αγνά γνωστικά σύμβολα φτάνουν στον κόσμο; Είναι προϊόντα της ανθρώπινης φαντασίας ή Θεϊκές αποκαλύψεις, απεικονίσεις αρχών και διαδικασιών της απαραβίαστης πρωταρχικής δημιουργίας; 
Αυτή η ερώτηση έχει προκαλέσει σφοδρές συζητήσεις και πολέμους μέσα σε ολόκληρη την ιστορία της ανθρωπότητας και ακόμη είναι πάντα επίκαιρη. Σύμφωνα με όσα είπαμε προηγουμένως, μπορούμε να συμπεράνουμε ότι ο αγνός γνωστικός συμβολισμός προέρχεται από αποκαλύψεις της Γνώσης και ότι οποιοσδήποτε άλλος συμβολισμός είναι προϊόν της ανθρώπινης συνείδησης.
Τα πιο αρχαία σύμβολα προέρχονται από την συμπαντική πηγή σοφίας, και βρίσκονται σε σύνδεση με τον κοιμισμένο πυρήνα της σοφίας που βρίσκεται μέσα στην ανθρώπινη καρδιά. Υψώνονται πάνω από κάθε εγωκεντρική και ψυχολογική εξήγηση. Τα λόγια 'Η βασιλεία των ουρανών είναι μέσα σας' εκφράζουν ότι οι 'ουρανοί' ή 'ο Θεός' δεν είναι ψυχολογικές φαντασιώσεις αλλά ότι η πύλη πρόσβασης στην Θεϊκή πραγματικότητα βρίσκεται στο ίδιο το κέντρο του ανθρώπινου όντος.
Μέσω του συνδέσμου που υπάρχει ανάμεσα στην Θεϊκή πραγματικότητα και το Θεϊκό κέντρο μέσα στον άνθρωπο εκδηλώνονται όλες οι αποκαλύψεις και όλα τα γνωστικά σύμβολα μέσα στον θνητό κόσμο.
Αυτός είναι ο σύνδεσμος στον οποίον αναφέρεται ο Χριστός με τα λόγια : 'Ο Πατέρας και εγώ είμαστε ένα'.
'Έτσι η θεότητα ανταποκρίνεται στο πνεύμα, το πνεύμα στην διάνοια, η διάνοια στην θέληση, η θέληση στην αναπαράσταση, η αναπαράσταση στην αντιληπτική ικανότητα, η  αντιληπτική ικανότητα στις αισθήσεις, και τέλος οι αισθήσεις στο αντικείμενο. Διότι αυτή είναι η αμοιβαία σχέση μέσω της οποίας κάθε άνωθεν πράγμα στέλνει τις ακτίνες διαμέσου κάθε πράγματος κάτω, χωρίς ασυνέχεια, μέχρι το τελευταίο.'
Αυτό το απόσπασμα από ένα αλχημικό έργο του 17ου αιώνα μας κάνει να δούμε ξεκάθαρα ότι τα γνωστικά σύμβολα έχουν διάφορες λειτουργίες :

1. την αποκάλυψη της ανώτερης φύσης μέσα στην κατώτερη.
2. το κάλεσμα για επιστροφή στην Θεϊκή πραγματικότητα.
3. την ανταπόκριση του ανθρώπου σε αυτήν την πρόκληση, την προοδευτική πραγμάτωση όλων των προσπαθειών του για μελέτη της εκδήλωσης και της εικόνας που διαμορφώνει αυτή.

Για αυτό πολλά σύμβολα και συμβολικές παραστάσεις επιμαρτυρούν για την Θεϊκή Αγάπη, για την αναζήτηση του ανθρώπου από τον Θεό και για την αναζήτηση του Θεού από τον άνθρωπο.  

Η πύλη ανάμεσα στον κόσμο και την αιωνιότητα

Ένα γνωστικό σύμβολο δεν είναι επομένως τόσο ένα σύμβολο της αλήθειας ή μια πληροφορία που αφορά αυτήν την αλήθεια, αλλά μια πύλη ανάμεσα στον χρόνο και την αιωνιότητα, ανάμεσα στην απαρχή και τον σκοπό. Ένα τέτοιο σύμβολο αυτό καθ' εαυτό δεν υπερβαίνει το σύνορο, πρέπει ο ίδιος ο άνθρωπος που βαδίζει προς την πραγματικότητα που υπάρχει πίσω από το σύμβολο να υπερβεί το σύνορο ο ίδιος. Κάθε συμπαντικό σύμβολο το οποίο οι υπηρέτες στον αμπελώνα του Θεού ακτινοβολούν συνειδητά μέσα στον θνητό κόσμο με την μορφή λόγων και εικόνων και κυρίως με το παράδειγμα της ίδιας τους της ζωής, είναι ένα κάλεσμα για επιστροφή.
Αυτό το σύμβολο δεν είναι μόνον ένα πνευματικό μήνυμα συνδεδεμένο με την Θεϊκή ζωή, αλλά επίσης η δύναμη η οποία κατέρχεται από το πρωταρχικό πεδίο ζωής. Έτσι η ανθρωπότητα δέχεται βοήθεια για να ανακαλύψει την εκδηλωμένη αλήθεια, να την κατανοήσει και να μετασχηματιστεί η ίδια σε ζωντανή πραγματικότητα.
Τα γνωστικά σύμβολα είναι αντίστοιχα περάσματα ανάμεσα στην αλήθεια την σχετική με τον άνθρωπο και την άφθαρτη αλήθεια του Χριστού. Ο Παύλος γράφει (επιστολή προς Κολοσσαείς 1, 15, 17, 19, 20)  : 'Ο οποίος (ο Χριστός) είναι η εικόνα του αθάνατου θεού, .. σε αυτόν έχουν δημιουργηθεί όλα τα πράγματα ....τόσο ότι είναι πάνω στην γη όσο και ότι είναι στους ουρανούς.' 'Ο λόγος έγινε σάρκα'. Στον Χριστό ο άνθρωπος είναι εκ νέου ένα όργανο του Θεϊκού κόσμου. Ο Χριστός έχει 'γκρεμίσει τον τοίχο της χωριστικότητας ανάμεσα στους δυο. Ανάμεσα στο γήινο και το Θεϊκό άνθρωπο' (Εφ.2, 14).

Η ενθάρρυνση και τα σύμβολα

Με δεδομένο το επίπεδο των γνωστικών συμβόλων, είναι κατανοητό ότι ο Καρλ Γιουνγκ οικτείρει που η εποχή μας έχει γίνει τόσο λίγο δεκτική στα σύμβολα. Όσο περισσότερο το ανθρώπινο ον αφήνεται να παρασυρθεί από το τεχνικό-οικονομικό ρεύμα της εποχής, τόσο περισσότερο χάνει την συνείδηση του εσωτερικού του χώρου. Κρίνει τα σύμβολα σύμφωνα με εξωτερικά κριτήρια, σαν ένα παιδί που απλώνει το χέρι του προς το φεγγάρι γιατί δεν συνειδητοποιεί την απόσταση.
Αλλά αν κατανοήσουμε πως ότι εκδηλώνει ένα γνωστικό σύμβολο αφορά άμεσα το βαθύτερο εσωτερικό μας ον, τότε εμφανίζεται μια άλλη σχέση με τον πρωταρχικό κόσμο. Η ζωή αλλάζει κατεύθυνση : ο άνθρωπος συνειδητοποιεί ότι η ύπαρξη του είναι αιώνια και ότι οδηγεί στην αυτογνωσία, άρα λογικά σε πράξεις ανάλογες, σε μια συμπεριφορά αποφασιστικά προσανατολισμένη προς την εσωτερική ζωή. Αυτός ο άνθρωπος συνειδητοποιεί τότε την ύπαρξη του Θεού μέσα του, και ότι αυτός ο 'άλλος' μέσα του ανασταίνεται αποκλειστικά μέσω του θανάτου του εγώ του. Όποιος δεν εκμεταλλεύεται τις δυνατότητες τις οποίες προσφέρει το γνωστικό σύμβολο πάνω στην οδό της εκπλήρωσης δεν κάνει τα τάλαντα που διαθέτει να καρποφορήσουν μαι τα εξασθενεί. Του λείπει η έμπνευση και το θάρρος το οποίο αυτό το υπέρτατο σύμβολο ακτινοβολεί μέσα στην καρδιά αυτού ο οποίος βρίσκεται αληθινά καθ' οδόν προς τον Θεό.
Τα γνωστικά σύμβολα είναι συχνά για την γήινη μας συνείδηση ένας θαμπός καθρέπτης, ωστόσο μας έχουν προσφερθεί για να εκπληρώσουμε τον αληθινό μας προορισμό του να επιστρέψουμε εκ νέου στον Θεό.