Εμφάνιση αναρτήσεων με ετικέτα Karl von Eckhartshausen. Εμφάνιση όλων των αναρτήσεων
Εμφάνιση αναρτήσεων με ετικέτα Karl von Eckhartshausen. Εμφάνιση όλων των αναρτήσεων

Παρασκευή 12 Ιανουαρίου 2018

Karl von Eckartshausen (1752-1803) A part from his letters



Karl von Eckartshausen  (1752-1803) 
A part from his letters

From Letter III
Absolute and relative truth

All the science of the world is based on the assumption that things are actually as they appear to be, even though it requires but little thought to understand the error of this supposition, for the appearance of things depends not only on what they really are, but in addition depends upon our organization and the constitution of our perceptive faculties. The greatest of the obstacles which the student of occult sciences encounters in his path of progress is having to abandon in himself the erroneous belief that things are as they appear to him; and unless he can raise himself above this superstition and consider things not merely from the relative point of view of his limited ego but from the infinite and the Absolute, he will not be capable of knowing absolute truth. 

Before we proceed further in our instructions respecting the practical method of approaching the Light, it will be necessary to impress with great force on the mind the illusory character of all external phenomena. All that the physical man knows concerning the outer world he has learned by means of the impressions that come to his consciousness through his senses. Receiving repeated or continually similar impressions. comparing one with another, and taking what he thinks he knows as a basis for speculations concerning the things that he does not know, he can form certain opinions with respect to things that he does not know , he can form certain opinions with reference to things which transcend his power of physical perception ; but as to the true or false character of his opinions with respect to things inner or outer , these opinions can be true only with respect to himself and with relation to other beings constituted the same as himself. 

In regard to other beings with entirely different organizations will find no application whatever; and there can exist in the universe incalculable millions of beings with entirely different organizations superior or inferior to ours to whom the world and all things appear under a completely different aspect, and who see all things in a different light. Such beings, though living in the same world in which we live, can know absolutely nothing of the world which is the only one conceivable to us; and we are not able to know anything intellectually of their world in spite of the fact that both the one and the other are identical. 

In other to see their world we need to be of sufficient strength to dismiss from ourselves all hereditary and acquired errors and preconceptions; we must raise ourselves to a higher level than that of the self that is bound to the sense world by a thousand chains, and must mentally occupy a place from which we can contemplate the world in its higher aspects. We must die, so to speak, to that with which spiritual beings are inconsistent, in order to acquire the consciousness of superior life and to see the world form the plane and point of view of a god. 

All of our modern science is for this reason only relative science, which is equivalent to saying all our modern scientific systems teach simply the relation existing between the outer and mutable things and the mundane manifestation of man, which is transitory and illusory , and in reality no more than an external apparition originated by a certain inner activity concerning which material science knows nothing. All scientific thought, apparently so high and important, is nevertheless nothing more than superficial knowledge, referring to one perhaps of the infinite number of aspects by means of which God manifests Him(Her)self.

Those who are in the ignorance above illustrated believe that their special manner of considering the world of phenomena is the only true one, and cling desperately to their illusions, believing them to be realities, and that those who realize their illusory character are dreamers. But as long as they cling to these illusions, they will not raise themselves above them; they will continue believing an illusory science, and will ask in vain for such knowledge to be shown them by God, while closing their eyes and withdrawing themselves from eternal light. It is not in any way our intention to ask that modern science shall attempt to enter the plane of the Absolute because in that case it would cease to be relative to external things, and would lose its utility in these things. 

It is admitted that colors have no reality in themselves and that a certain number of ondulations or wave motions of light cause them, but we have no intention in the foregoing statements of discouraging purely scientific investigation, but only to instruct people for whom superficial and external knowledge is insufficient, and also to moderate if possible the presumption of those who think they are possessed of wisdom and who, chained to their illusions, lose the view of the external and the real and carry their presumption and blind vanity even to the point of denying their own existence. 

It will be admitted that it is not the external body that sees, hears, smells, reasons, and thinks, but that it is the inner man, to us invisible, who discharges these functions by means of the physical organs. There is no reason for us to believe that this inner man ceases to exist when the body dies, on the contrary, as we shall see later, to suppose such a thing is opposite to all reason. If the inner man loses by the death of physical organism the power of receiving sensible impressions from the external world, and if in consequence of the loss of the brain he loses the power of thinking, it will change completely the relations under which he lives in this world, and his future existence will be quite different from ours. His world will not be our world, although in the absolute sense of the word, both worlds are one. 

Thus it is that in this same world there can exist a million different worlds, in which there are millions of beings whose constitutions differ one from another; in other words there is but one nature, but it may appear under an infinite number of aspects. According to each of the changes of our organization, the world is presented to us from a different angle; at each death we enter into a new world, although it is not necessarily the world that has changed, but only our relations with it which vary in the course of time.

Who knows the world according to absolute truth? What is it that we really know? There can in reality exist neither Sun nor Moon nor Earth; neither fire nor air nor water can have real existence; all of these things exist with relation to ourselves only while we are in a certain state of consciousness, during which we believe that they exist. In the kingdom of phenomena absolute truth does not exist; not even in mathematics do we find absolute truth, because all mathematical rules are relative, and are founded on certain suppositions referring to magnitude and extension which in themselves posses no more than a phenomenal character. Change the fundamental concept upon which mathematics is based, and the entire system of necessity suffers complete change. The same may be said in regard to our concepts of matter, of movement and of space. 

These are words, pure and simple: merely expressions for indicating to ourselves certain ideas that we have formed concerning really inconceivable things. In other words they indicate certain states of our consciousness. If we look at a tree, an image is formed in the mind, which is equivalent to saying that we enter a certain state of consciousness that puts us into relation with an external phenomenon concerning whose real nature we know nothing but to which we give the name of tree. But to a being organized differently, it would not be a tree but something quite different, possibly transparent, and without solid matter; in fact, to a thousand beings with constitutions different one from another, this would appear under a thousand different aspects. We can see the Sun only as a globe of fire, but to a being whose perceptive faculties are superior to ours, what we call the Sun would be seen in a manner totally indescribable to us; because lacking the necessary faculties to describe it, the description becomes inconceivable to us. 

The outer man maintains a certain relation with the outer world, and as such can know no more of the world than this external relation. Some people may object that we should be content with that knowledge and not attempt to go deeper. This, however, is equivalent to depriving one of any further progress and of condemning one to remain sunk in error and in ignorance, because his only means of knowledge is a science that depends entirely upon illusions and which is therefore no more than an illusory science. 

Moreover, the external aspect of things is the consequence of an inner activity, and unless the true character of the external phenomenon will not be really understood. Besides the real inner man, who resides in the external form, maintains certain relations with the inner activity of the cosmos which are no less strict and definite than the relations existing between external man and external nature; and unless man recognizes the relations which link him to that power, in other words, to God, he will never comprehend his own divine nature and will never reach the true knowledge of himself. 

To teach the true relation existing between man and the infinite Whole and to raise him to that plane of exalted life that he should occupy in nature, is and must be the one and true object of all true religion and true science. The fact that a man may have been born in a certain city does not indicate that he must remain there all his life; the fact that a man has been for a long time in any condition physically, morally, or intellectually inferior, does not impose upon him the necessity of remaining forever in such state, nor debar him from elevating himself to greater heights. The highest possible knowledge is that having the highest object; and there can exist no higher nor more worthy object for consideration than the cause of universal good. God is, therefore, the highest objective of human knowledge, and we can know nothing regarding Him that is not manifested by His activity in our inner minds. 

To obtain a knowledge of the superior self is equivalent to obtaining a knowledge of the divine principle within ourselves; in other words, a knowledge of our own inner self after it has turned to the divine and has awakened to a consciousness of its divinity. Then the inner divine self will recognize the relations existing between itself and the divine principle in the universe, if we can speak of relations existing between two things which are not two but are one and the same. In order to express ourselves more correctly, we should say the spiritual knowledge of the One Self is attained when God recognizes His own divinity in man. All power whether pertaining to the body, the soul, or the intelligent principle in man originates from the center, Spirit. To spiritual activity man owes the fact that he sees, feels, hears, and perceives with his outer senses. In the greater number of men this inner spiritual force has awakened only by the intellectual ability and brought into activity the outer senses. 

But there are exceptional persons in whom this spiritual activity has reached a much higher plane, and in whom have been unfolded the highest or inner faculties of perception. Such people can perceive things that are invisible to others, and can exercise powers not possessed by the rest of mortals. If so-called wise men encounter such a case as above, referred to, they consider it to be caused by a sickly condition of the body, and designate it as the effect of a ―pathological condition‖; for it’s a fact of everyday experience that external, superficial knowledge embracing absolutely nothing respecting the fundamental laws of Nature, continually repeatedly mistakes causes for effects and effects for causes. With equal reason and with the same logic a flock of sheep might say to one of their number which had attained the faculty of speech with its ―pathological condition. 

Thus it is that wisdom appears foolishness to the foolish; to the blind the light is but darkness; virtue is a vice to the vicious; truth seems trickery to the false; and everywhere we see that man perceives things not as they are but as he imagines them. Thus we see that whatever men are accustomed to calling good or evil or false, useful or useless, is so perceived in but a relative sense. It may be true relative to one person and be quite the contrary with respect to another whose opinions, objectives, or aspirations are different. It is also a necessary consequence of this state of things that where language commences, confusion begins, because owing to the differentiations continually taking place in the diverse constitutions of men, their manner of forming concepts will differ one form another. 

This being the truth in ordinary affairs, it is yet more in evidence in questions relating to the occult, concerning which the greater part of men posses only false ideas, and it is doubtful that one sentence could be uttered which would not give rise to disputes and false interpretations. The only truths found to be outside the reach of all disputes are absolute truths, and these need not be stated as they are self-evident. To express them by means of language is to say what all the world knows and what no one controverts; for example, to say that God is the cause of all good simply means that we are symbolizing to ourselves the unknown origin of all good with the word ―God.‖ All relative truth refers only to the unstable personalities of men, and no one can know truth in the absolute excepting the one who, rising above the sphere of self and of phenomena, reaches the region of the real, eternal and immutable. 

To do this it is necessary in a certain sense to die to the world; or what is the same, to unburden one’s self completely of the idea of self, which is an illusion, and to become one with the Universal, in which being there is not the least sense of separation. If thou art disposed to die thus, thou mayest pass through the door into the sanctuary of the hidden knowledge, but if the illusions of the outer worlds, and above all if the illusions of thine own personal existence lure thee, in vain wilt thou seek the knowledge of that which exists in itself, and which is entirely independent of all things; that which is the eternal center, the flaming center, from which all proceed and to which all return; the Father , to Whom none may draw near other than the Son , Who is the Light, the Life , and the Supreme Truth.

Τρίτη 29 Αυγούστου 2017

Karl von Eckartshausen's Religiöse Schriften über Klares und Dunkles 1839



Karl von Eckartshausen's Religiöse Schriften über Klares und Dunkles 1839

Ένα πανέμορφο και πολύ διδακτικό σχέδιο μέσα από το οποίο κατανοούμε πως μπορεί να δημιουργηθεί μέσα μας η Εικόνα του Ουράνιου Ανθρώπου.

Η βεβαιότητες είναι πως :
ζούμε μέσα σε μια σκοτεινή φυλακή, 
πως η βοήθεια από τους πνευματικούς εργάτες υπάρχει μέσα σε αυτό το ζοφερό πεδίο, 
πως υπάρχει μια έξοδος από αυτό το αδιέξοδο 
και φυσικά το κυριαρχικό στοιχείο, 
δηλαδή η ύπαρξη του Χριστού έξω από αυτό το έκπτωτο πεδίο, αλλά συγχρόνως και η δυνατότητα ανάσυρσις που μας δίνει μέσα από το άνοιγμα, την Φωτεινή Πύλη, πως; 

Μέσω του Μυστήριου του Γολγοθά, δηλαδή την μίμηση της ζωής του, δηλαδή τον Ένδοξο Δρόμο του Σταυρού.

Παρασκευή 11 Νοεμβρίου 2011

The Cloud upon the Sanctuary By Karl von Eckhartshausen (1752-1803)


The Cloud upon the Sanctuary By  Karl von Eckhartshausen (1752-1803)

TRANSLATED (with notes) BY MADAME ISABEL DE STEIGER
 Published in six parts in the periodical "The Unknown World", 1895.

LETTER I
Scanned from "The Unknown World", No. 6 - Vol. I, Jan. 15, 1895, and corrected by hand.
There is no age more remarkable to the quiet observer than our own. Everywhere there is a fermentation in the minds of men; everywhere there is a battle between light and darkness, between exploded thought and living ideas, between powerless wills and living active force; in short everywhere is there war between animal man and growing spiritual man. 
It is said that we live in an age of light, but it would be truer to say that we are living in an age of twilight; here and there a luminous ray pierces through the mists of darkness, but does not light to full clearness either our reason or our hearts. Men are not of one mind, scientists dispute, and where there is discord truth is not yet apprehended. 
The most important objects for humanity are still undetermined. No one is agreed either on the principle of rationality or on the principle of morality, or on the cause of the will.  This proves that though we are dwelling in an age of light, we do not well understand what emanates from our hearts- and what from our heads.  Probably we should have this information much sooner if we did not imagine that we have the light of knowledge already in our hands, or if we would cast a look on our weakness, and recognize that we require a more brilliant illumination.  We live in the times of idolatry of the intellect, we place a common torchlight upon the altar and we loudly proclaim the aurora, that now daylight is really about to appear, and that the world is emerging more and more out of obscurity into the full day of perfection, through the arts, sciences, cultured taste, and even from a purer understanding of religion. 
Poor mankind!  To what standpoint have you raised the happiness of man? Has there ever been an age which has counted so many victims to humanity as the present? Has there ever been an age in which immorality and egotism have been greater or more dominant than in this one?  The tree is known by its fruits. Mad men! With your imaginary natural reason, from whence have you the light by which you are so willing to enlighten others? Are not all your ideas borrowed from your senses which do not give you the reality but merely its phenomena?  Is it not true that in time and space all knowledge is but relative? Is it not true that all which we call reality is but relative, for absolute truth is not to be found in the phenomenal world? Thus your natural reason does not possess its true essence, but only the appearance of truth and light; and the more this appearance increases and spreads, the more the essence of light inwardly fades, and the man confuses himself with this appearance and gropes vainly after the dazzling phantasmal images he conjures. 
The philosophy of our age raises the natural intellect into independent objectivity, and gives it judicial power, she exempts it from any superior authority, she makes it voluntary, converting it into divinity by closing all harmony and communication with God; and this god Reason, which has no other law but its own, is to govern Man and make him happy! ... 

... Darkness able to spread light! 

.. Death capable of giving Life! 

... The truth leads man to happiness. Can you give it? 

That which you call truth is a form of conception empty of real matter, the knowledge of which is acquired from without and through the senses, and the understanding co-ordinates them by observed synthetic relationship into science or opinion. 
You abstract from the Scriptures and Tradition their moral, theoretical and practical truth; but as individuality is the principle of your intelligence, and as egotism is the incentive to your will, you do not see, by your light, the moral law which dominates, or you repel it with your will.  It is to this length that the light of to-day has penetrated. Individuality under the cloak of false philosophy is a child of corruption. 
Who can pretend that the sun is in full zenith if no bright rays illuminate the earth, and no warmth vitalizes vegetation? If wisdom does not benefit man, if love does not make him happy, but very little has been done for him on the whole. 
Oh! If only natural man, that is, sensuous man, would only learn to see that the source of his intelligence and the incentive of his will are only his individuality, he would then seek interiorly for a higher source, and he would thereby approach that which alone can give this true element, because it is wisdom in its essential substance. 
Jesus Christ is that Wisdom, Truth and Love.  He, as Wisdom, is the Principle of reason, and the Source of the purest intelligence. As Love, He is the Principle of morality, the true and pure incentive of the will. 
Love and Wisdom beget the spirit of truth, interior light; this light illuminates us and makes supernatural things objective to us. 
It is inconceivable to what depths of error a man falls when he abandons simple truths of faith by opposing his own opinions. 
Our century tries to decide by its (brain) intelligence, wherein lies the principle or ground of reason and morality, or the ground of the will; if the scientists were mindful, they would see that these things are better answered in the heart of the simplest man, than through their most brilliant casuistry. The practical Christian finds this incentive to the will, the principle of all morality, really and objectively in his heart; and this incentive is expressed in the following formula:- "Love God with all thy heart, and thy neighbor as thyself." 
The love of God and his neighbor is the motive for the Christian's will, and the essence of love itself is Jesus Christ in Us. 
It is in this way the principle of reason is wisdom in us; and the essence of wisdom, wisdom in its substance, is again Jesus Christ, the light of the world. Thus we find in Him the principle of reason and of morality.     
All that I am now saying is not hyperphysical extravagance; it is reality, absolute truth, that everyone can prove for himself by experience, as soon as he receives in himself the principle of all reason and morality- Jesus Christ, being wisdom and love in essence. 
But the eye of the man of sensuous perception only is firmly closed to the fundamental basis of all that is true and to all that is transcendental. 
The intelligence which many would fain raise to legislative authority is only that of the senses, whose light differs from that of transcendental reason, as does the phosphorescent glimmer of decayed wood from the glories of sunshine. 
Absolute truth does not exist for sensuous man; it exists only for interior and spiritual man who possesses a suitable sensorium; or, to speak more correctly, who possesses an interior sense to receive the absolute truth of the transcendental world, a spiritual faculty which cognizes spiritual objects as objectively and naturally as the exterior senses perceive external phenomena. 
This interior faculty of the man spiritual; this sensorium for the metaphysical world is unfortunately not known to those who cognize only outside of it- for it is a mystery of the kingdom of God. 
The current incredulity towards everything which is not cognized objectively by our senses is the explanation for the misconception of truths which are, of all, most important to man. 
But how can this be otherwise?  In order to see one must have eyes, to hear, one must have ears.  Every apparent object requires its appropriate senses.  So it is that transcendental objects require their sensorium- and this said sensorium is closed in most men.  Hence men judge the metaphysical world through the intelligence of their senses, even as the blind imagine colors and the deaf judge tones- without suitable senses. 
There is an objective and substantial ground of reason, an objective and substantial motive for the will.  These two together form the new principle of life, and morality is there essentially inherent. This pure substance of reason and will, re-united in us the divine and the human, is Jesus Christ, the light of the world, who must enter into direct relationship with us, to be really recognized. 
This real knowledge is actual faith, in which everything takes place in spirit and in truth. 
Thus one ought to have a sensorium fitted for this communication, an organized spiritual sensorium, a spiritual and interior faculty able to receive this light; but it is closed to most men by their senses. 
This interior organ is the intuitive sense of the transcendental world, and until this intuitive sense is effective in us we can have no certainty of more lofty truths. 
This organism is naturally inactive since the Fall, which degraded man to the world of physical senses alone. The gross matter which envelops this interior sensorium is a film which veils the internal eye, and therefore prevents the exterior eye from seeing into spiritual realms.  This same matter muffles our internal hearing, so that we are deaf to the sounds of the metaphysical world; it so paralyses our spiritual speech that we can scarcely stammer words of sacred import, words we fully pronounced once, and by virtue of which we held authority over the elements and the external world. 
The opening of this spiritual sensorium is the mystery of the New Man- the mystery of Regeneration, and of the vital union between God and man- it is the noblest object of religion on earth, that religion whose sublime goal is none other than to unite men with God in Spirit and in Truth. 
We can therefore easily see by this how it is that religion tends always towards the subjection of the senses. It does so because it desires to make the spiritual man dominant, in order that the spiritual or truly rational man may govern the man of sense. Philosophy feels this truth, only its error consists in not apprehending the true source of reason, and because she would replace it by individuality by sensuous reason. 
As man has internally a spiritual organ and a sensorium to receive the true principle of divine wisdom, or a true motive for the will or divine love, he has also exteriorly a physical and material sensorium to receive the appearance of light and truth. As external nature can have no absolute truth, but only phenomenally relative, therefore, human reason cannot cognize pure truth, it can but apprehend through the appearance of phenomena, which excites the lust of the eye, and in this as a source of action consists the corruption of sensuous man and the degradation of nature. 
This exterior sensorium in man is composed of frail matter, whereas the internal sensorium is organized fundamentally from incorruptible, transcendental, and metaphysical substance. 
The first is the cause of our depravity and our mortality, the second the cause of our incorruptibility and of our immortality. 
In the regions of material and corruptible nature mortality hides immortality, therefore all our trouble results from corruptible mortal matter.  In order that man should be released from this distress, it is necessary that the immortal and incorruptible principle, which dwells within, should expand and absorb the corruptible principle, so that the envelope of the senses should be opened, and man appear in his pristine purity. 
This natural envelope is a truly corruptible substance found in our blood, forming the fleshly bonds binding our immortal spirits under the servitude of the mortal flesh. 
This envelope can be rent more or less in every man, and this places him in greater spiritual liberty, and makes him more cognizant of the transcendental world. 
There are three different degrees in the opening of our spiritual sensorium. 
The first degree reaches to the moral plane only, the transcendental world energizes through us in but by interior action, called inspiration. 
The second and higher degree opens this sensorium to the reception of the spiritual and the intellectual, and the metaphysical world works in us by interior illumination. 
The third degree, which is the highest and most seldom attained, opens the whole inner man.  It breaks the crust which fills our spiritual eyes and ears; it reveals the kingdom of spirit, and enables us to see objectively, metaphysical, and transcendental sights; hence all visions are explained fundamentally. 
Thus we have an internal sense of objectivity as well as externally. Only the objects and the senses are different. Exteriorly animal and sensual motives act in us and corruptible sensuous matter energizes.  Interiorly it is metaphysical and indivisible substance which gains admittance within, and the incorruptible and immortal essence of our Spirit receives its influence. Nevertheless, generally things pass much in the same way interiorly as they do externally. The law is everywhere the same. Hence, as the spirit or our internal man has quite other senses, and quite another objective sight from the rational man; one need not be surprised that it (the spirit) should remain an enigma for the scientists of our age, for those who have no objective sense of the transcendental and spiritual world.  Hence they measure the supernatural by the measurement of the senses.  However, we owe a debt of gratitude towards the philosopher Kant for his view of the truths we have promulgated. 
Kant has shown incontestably that the natural reason can know absolutely nothing of what is supernatural, and that it can never understand analytically or synthetically, neither can it prove the possibility of the reality of Love, Spirit, or of the Deity. 
This is a great truth, lofty and beneficial for our epoch, though it is true that St. Paul has already enunciated it (I Cor., i., 2-24). 
But the pagan philosophy of Christian scientists has been able to overlook it up to Kant.  The virtue of this truth is double. First it puts insurmountable limits to the sentiment, to the fanaticism and to the extravagance of carnal reason. Then it shows by dazzling contrast the necessity and divinity of Revelation. It proves that our human reason, in its state of unfoldment, “has no other” objective source for the supernatural than revelation, the only source of instruction in Divine things or of the spiritual world, the soul and its immortality; hence it follows that without revelation it is absolutely impossible to suppose or conjecture anything regarding these matters. 
We are, therefore, indebted to Kant for proving philosophically now-a-days, what long ago was taught in a more advanced and illumined school, “that without revelation no knowledge of God, neither any doctrine touching the soul could be at all possible”. 
It is therefore clear that a universal Revelation must serve as a fundamental basis to all mundane religion. 
Hence, following Kant, it is clear that the transmundane knowledge is wholly inaccessible to natural reason, and that God inhabits a world of light, into which no speculation of the unfolded reason can penetrate.  Thus the rational man, or man of human reason, has no sense of transcendental reality, and therefore it was necessary that it should be revealed to him, for which faith is required, because the means are given to him by faith whereby his inner sensorium unfolds, and through which he can apprehend the reality of truths otherwise incapable of being understood by the natural man. 
It is quite true that with new senses we can acquire sense of further reality.  This reality exists already, but is not known to us, because we lack the organ by which to cognize it.  One must not lay the fault to the percept, but on the receptive organ. 
With, however, the development of the new organ we have a new perception, a sense of new reality.  Without it the spiritual world cannot exist for us, because the organ rendering it objective to us is not developed. 
With, however, its unfoldment, the curtain is all at once raised, the impenetrable veil is torn away, the cloud before the Sanctuary lifts, a new world suddenly exists for us, scales fall from the eyes, and we are at once transported from the phenomenal world to the regions of truth. 
God alone is substance, absolute truth; He alone is He who is, and we are what He has made us.  For Him, all exists in Unity, for us, all exists in multiplicity. 
A great many men have no more idea of the development of the inner sensorium than they have of the true and objective life of the spirit, which they neither perceive nor foresee in any manner.  Hence it is impossible to them to know that one can comprehend the spiritual and transcendental, and that one can be raised to the supernatural, even to vision. 
The great and true work of building the Temple consists solely in destroying the miserable Adamic hut and in erecting a divine temple; this means, in other words, to develop in us the interior sensorium, or the organ to receive God.  After this process, the metaphysical and incorruptible principle rules over the terrestrial, and man begins to live, not any longer in the principle of self-love, but in the Spirit and in the Truth, of which he is the Temple. 
The moral law then evolves into love for one's neighbor in deed and in truth, whereas for the natural man it is but a simple attitude of thought; and the spiritual man, regenerated in spirit, sees all in its essence, of which the natural man has only the forms void of thought, mere empty sounds, symbols and letters, which are all dead images without interior spirit. The lofty aim of religion is the intimate union of man with God; and this union is possible in this world; but it only can be by the opening of our inner sensorium, which enables our hearts to become receptive to God. 
Therein are mysteries that our philosophy does not dream of, the key to which is not to be found in scholastic science. 
Meanwhile, a more advanced school has always existed to whom this deposition of all science has been confided, and this school was the community illuminated interiorly by the Savior, the society of the Elect, which has continued from the first day of creation to the present time; its members, it is true, are scattered all over the world, but they have always been united in the spirit and in one truth; they have had but one intelligence and one source of truth, but one doctor and one master; but in whom resides substantially the whole plentitude of God, and who alone initiates them into the high mysteries of Nature and the Spiritual World. 
This community of light has been called from all time the invisible celestial Church, or the most ancient of all communities, of which we will speak more fully in our next letter. 

TRANSLATOR'S NOTE.
I am afraid that some readers who are interested in "Mysticism," or rather are desirous of entering into its study, may be deterred from doing so by reading these letters of the excellent Mystic, Eckartshausen. For the reason that his doctrine, Regeneration, has been so much misunderstood owing to the over-familiarity with the ordinary signification of that deeply important word, that modern Religion mostly given us. Nevertheless, no reader can fail to see that Eckartshausen has a very real and vital reason for all he says. His language is extraordinarily simple, so much so that many may consider that he hides deeper matter purposely. 
This is not quite the case; in all Catholic and central truth there are various meanings, not opposing ones, but each opening, as it were, according to the grade of the student's own spiritual understanding. 
Indeed, it is very frequently urged against mystic and alchemic writings that they purposely and selfishly veil the truth. No doubt in many cases it has been purposely done, for very sincerely good reasons that real enquiry would amply endorse; but it is by no means a true bill against "Mystic" writings that the language is deliberately symbolic, allegoric, or in a sort of cipher-code, as it were, in which one word is mischievously meant for another and so forth.  I have heard all alchemic works described, indeed once thought so myself, as a farrago of pure bosh.  But we know, as most people now-a-days who pretend to any philosophy at all, that there are other planes of nature besides the physical, and that mystic and alchemical writings are not generally dealing with physical or mental matters and nomenclature. They refer to higher planes of nature- and if a student is able to enter into higher planes I understand that the terms and expressions all take simple and rightful place.  But all that a student can do in his first study in these matters is to try and discern somewhat where the planes change and where the writer mean literally on the higher plane or parabolically on the physical or on what plane is the literalness?  But most alchemic writing is hyperphysical.  Origen says "to the literal minded (or carnal) we teach the Gospel in the historic or literal way, but to the proficients, fired with the love of Divine Wisdom, we impart the Logos." Also we must remember that these writers were Spiritual giants; men who had gone through the vital process of Regeneration, and who wrote to others in like condition, not to the carnal minded or literal man, who have their spiritual "sensorium," as Eckhartshausen calls it, still sealed. 
We are, therefore, grateful when a Spiritual giant like Eckhartshausen writes as he does in simpler fashion, one more suitable to the plane of intellectuality on which we usually are. He tells us literally that man has fallen from his high estate, as we have all been taught in "common" Christianity, and he proceeds to point out the Spiritual rationale whereby man may attain his former Greatness.  In doing so, he explains in a most suggestive manner the real value of the rites and ceremonies of Catholic Christendom, the Church as he teaches being the outer manifestation of that Inner Society (the nameless one), that Society of the Elect which has always existed, and must still exist, for the protection of mankind.  If this Sacred Circle, this Celestial Church, did not subsist, our earthly sinful Churches could not exist. That they do is a proof of its holy Guardianship- Eckhartshausen's letters on the subject explanatory of this position, are most instructive. There are doubtless a few elect souls who are so richly laden with the ten talents they have earned in preceding lives, that they can, so to say, take the Kingdom of Heaven with violence and obtain their Regeneration and Immortality early in this life, without possibly belonging to any Society, whether Church organization or otherwise, but to most people this is impossible; and we then, as humbler students, do well to lay heed to the great importance of Christian rites and ceremonies- especially that of the Sacred Supper. This is, of course, not new teaching to instructed Catholics, but I would respectfully suggest that Eckhartshausen does lead the understanding to higher ground and higher possibilities, as a permitted Initiate, than Church teaching generally can do, because Catholic Doctrine does not, cannot fully explain.  It is her function only to enunciate ex cathedra as the legitimately authorized channel of communication; but certain writers, Initiates and Regenerate men, have special offices, of instructors and explainers.  Therefore those peeple who have not the gift of Faith to receive enunciated Doctrine, have indeed much to be thankful for in that there are such writers who are permitted to explain the reason why of doctrine and dogma. To minds, then, who are not gifted with Faith, or who have not attained to it, the writings of the mystics are priceless, as no doubt through them the student who only commenced the quest through mere but honest curiosity and desire, if, however, he continue sincere and earnest, can without doubt rise not only to the region of faith, but in addition with a clear understanding, and he then is in a still better condition for further advancement. Mad is that person who with the grace and gift of Faith to commence with has left his talent untouched! 
"The Cloud upon the Sanctuary" is written in six letters, and they show the meaning of Revelation, the means whereby man can receive it; the supreme importance of man's Regeneration and the means whereby he can attain to it.  And I may here say that a Regenerated Man in Mystic phraseology is equivalent to "Mahatma," or may be more; in modern theosophic terms, it means a Master, and until man attains to this rank he is not able to fully recognize the Master, so must always remain until that time outside the Temple, not yet fit to enter within the sacred precincts and be hailed as a true Builder by the Master Builder Himself.  Regeneration is moreover the only means by which he gains freedom from Karma, and is thenceforth freed from the Circle of Necessity or Re-birth.  There is one other matter to note, both in reading sacred writ and mystic writers, that if we find one meaning pretty clear throughout we may conclude we have one key, but that is all, and because we understand this side of the truth is just the reason that we have not all the truth.  If we keep this well in our minds it will be a useful preventive against spiritual pride, for it will keep us always respectful to out brothers' and sisters' versions of the matter. Nevertheless there is something so real, so solid, so concrete in the presentment of Mystic Truth that if that foundation be firmly realised it is remarkable how much more easily the building is raised than we could imagine while wandering in the phantasmal regions of astral Revelations- that realm of Chaos out of and from which man has been lifted, by being created Rational Man, but towards which he too easily returns on a retrograde course.  We must also note that Eckhartshausen lived and wrote at the period of the French Revolution; at an era very similar to our own in all but its sad consummation. "Magic" was the fashion, and quite as much was known then on these matters as is known now. There were spiritual circles, occult societies, brotherhoods, and a great searching into the "hidden things of the Spirit." 
We have St. Martin's valuable authority at that period for thinking very highly of Eckhartshausen as a man who worked and thought centrally, and whose writings commanded his highest respect. 
ISABEL DE STEIGER. 
 http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Karl_von_Eckartshausen

Karl von Eckartshausen (1752-1803): “Die innere Kirche entstund…”

 The Christian theosopher Karl von Eckartshausen was an eminent and influential exponent of early German romanticism. His work in natural philosophy and Christian theosophy was read and discussed by some of the most well-known European writers and poets of his time. In Germany Johann Wolfgang von Goethe, Friedrich Schiller, Johann Gottfried Herder (who regarded him as the prophet of ‘Harmonie im Sittlichen und in der Natur’ – harmony in morality and in nature) and especially also Novalis knew his work. In Russia, where his works appeared in translation, he was mentioned in the novels of Nikolai Gogol (Dead Souls) and Leo Tolstoy (War and Peace). Tsar Alexander I was an avid reader of his work. In France, Eckartshausen influenced contemporary mystical thinkers and Böhmist theosophers such as Louis-Claude de Saint-Martin (‘le Philosophe Inconnu’) (1743-1803) and members of various Martinist circles.

With regard to Naturphilosophie, the Christian kabbalah and Christian theosophy, corresponding themes may be discovered between his work and that of his friends, the Christian theosophers and philosophers Franz von Baader (1765-1841) and Johann Heinrich Jung-Stilling (1740-1817). Works by Eckartshausen were translated in several languages and published especially in France and Russia, as part of a strongly revived interest in these countries in Hermetic philosophy and Christian kabbalah. In Russia, this revival was stimulated through the book production in the masonic and Rosicrucian circles of Nikolai Novikov and Ivan Vladimirovitch Lopuchin (1756-1816). Only much later (towards the end of the 19th century), English translations of Eckartshausen’s works began to appear. Through the exertions of Arthur Edward Waite, the mysticism of both Eckartshausen and Lopuchin received more public attention in the Anglo-Saxon world.

Eckartshausen lived and worked in the south of Germany, straddling the cultural divide between the German Aufklärung (Enlightenment) and the early Romantic period. He defended his own kind of religious philosophy against the new rationalism and materialism of what he considered the wrong sort of Enlightenment. Strongly involved in the social and legal developments in his society, he foresaw and warned against the political and religious unrest in the era of the French Revolution (1789-1801). He joined Adam Weishaupt’s masonic order of the Illuminaten (Illuminates) but withdrew his membership soon after discovering that this order only recognized enlightenment through human reason (‘Man cannot enlighten: the truth enlightens…’). His works have always confronted the turbulent political, social and religious reality of his times and thus caught the early romantic Zeitgeist. This holds true for his early legal studies, the didactic, political and polemic works (Über Religion, Freydenkerey und Aufklärung, 1785-86), the theatrical plays, the sentimental and romantic-theosophical narratives (Kostis Reise), and the later religious, theosophical and spiritual works from Aufschlüsse zur Magie onwards.

Eckartshausen did not always mention his sources (but see nrs. 9a-b). However, his esoteric thinking unmistakably contains elements from the writings of Paracelsus, the theosophy of Jacob Böhme, the Christian kabbalah (e.g. in Zahlenlehre der Natur, 1794, possibly through Welling’s influential Opus mago-cabbalisticum), the Hermetic Gnosis and from spiritual alchemy (e.g. the posthumously published Katechismus der höheren Chemie zum Beweis der Analogie der Wahrheiten der Natur mit den Wahrheiten des Glaubens).

Antoine Faivre, who devoted his PhD thesis to Eckartshausen, has recognized a number of themes and motives in his work. First, Faivre distinguishes the principle of analogy or correspondence. This Hermetic principle allowed new insights attained by modern natural science to be interpreted as so many confirmations of long-existing theosophical intuitions. Another motive appearing in the major texts by both Ivan Lopuchin and Eckartshausen is the concept of the Inner Church. Here Faivre sees Lopuchin’s indebtedness to Eckartshausen, but the influence may have been less pronounced or may have been mutual (for this point, see also Danilov’s study of Lopuchin). The outer church and its many changing appearances and doctrinal differences were neither denied nor dismissed – in fact an interdependence of outer and inner church was recognized, but the spiritual meaning of the mystical inner room was given special emphasis. Ideas about the relations between man and the divine and between creation and the mortality of nature were formed on the basis of especially gnostic and theosophical insights. Eckartshausen further valued nature and the principle of regeneration, which made a union with God a possibility. Influences of alchemy (the three principles mercury, sulphur and salt), Pythagorean number symbolism (arithmology or arithmosophy), and the Christian and magical kabbalah directed his religious-philosophical as well as his scientific search.

According to Eckartshausen, philosophy without religion would lead to freethinking; religion without philosophy to Schwärmerei and superstition. In Die Wolke über dem Heiligtum (The cloud upon the sanctuary) Eckartshausen expressed it as follows: ‘Alles was die äussere Kirche an Symbolen, Zeremonien und Ritualen besitzt, ist Buchstabe, von dem der Geist und die Wahrheit in der inneren Kirche liegt’ (‘Everything the outer Church possesses by way of symbols, ceremonies and rituals, is Letter, the spirit and truth of which lies in the inner Church’). He also discovered the outer and inner qualities in language and letters and developed his own aphoristic writing style without too many structural elements or any clear progression of thoughts and ideas. Still, this outwardly formless style, according to some, was most apposite in order to call forth his inner ideas and the coherence of his mystical insights.

1785 Über Religion, Freydenkerey und Aufklärung, Munich
 
Select bibliography:

Andrej V. Danilov, Iwan Lopuchin. Erneuerer der russischen Freimaurerei. Seine Lehre von der inneren Kirche als eigenständiger Beitrag zum Lehrgebäude der freimaurerischen Mystik, Dettelbach 2000
Dictionary of Gnosis and Western Esotericism, ed. W.J. Hanegraaff et.al., 2 vols, Leiden 2005, for entries on Baader (Arthur Versluis), Eckartshausen (Jacques Fabry), Lopuchin (Antoine Faivre), Saint-Martin (Arthur McCalla).
Raffaela Faggionato, ‘Un' utopia rosacrociana. Massoneria, rosacrocianesimo e illuminismo nella Russia settecentesca: il circolo di N.I. Novikov’, in: Archivio di storia della cultura, 10 (1997), pp.11-276
Antoine Faivre, Eckartshausen et la théosophie chrétienne, Paris 1969
Hans Grassl, Aufbruch zur Romantik. Bayerns Beitrag zur deutschen Geistesgeschichte 1765-1785, München 1968, pp. 319-335
Edward Burton Penny, ed. Theosophic correspondence between Louis Claude de Saint-Martin and Kirchberger, Baron de Liebistorf, Pasadena, Ca 1949
Arthur Edward Waite, “Introduction” to 3rd edition of English translation The Cloud upon the Sanctuary by Isabelle de Steiger, 1909 (first ed. of tr. 1896)
Arthur Edward Waite, “Introduction” to I.V. Lopuchin, Some characteristics of the interior church, tr. D.H.S. Nicholson; ed. Waite, 1912
From :  http://www.ritmanlibrary.nl/c/p/h/bel_16.html

Κυριακή 5 Δεκεμβρίου 2010

Karl von Eckhartshausen - The Cloud upon the Sanctuary -

 
The Cloud upon the Sanctuary - Karl von Eckhartshausen (1752-1803)

Translated (with notes) 
by Madame Isabel De Steiger
Published in six parts in the periodical 
"The Unknown World", 1895.

LETTER VI AND LAST

The Kingdom of God is a kingdom of truth, morality, and happiness. It operates in the saints from the innermost to the outside, and spreads itself gradually by the Spirit of Jesus Christ into all nations, to institute everywhere an Order by means of which the individual can reach as well as the race; our human nature can be raised to its highest perfection, and sick humanity be cured from all the evils of its weakness. 
Thus the love and spirit of God Will one day alone vivify all humanity; they will awake and rekindle all the strength of the human race, will lead it to the goals of Wisdom and place it in suitable relationships. 
Peace, fidelity, domestic harmony, love between nations, will be the first fruits of this Spirit. Inspiration of good without false similitudes, the exaltation of our souls without too severe a tension, warmth in the heart without turbulent impatience, will approach, reconcile, and unite all the various parts of the human race, long separated and divided by many differences, and stirred up against each other by prejudices and errors, and in one Grand Temple of Nature, great and little, poor and rich, all will sing the praise of the Father of Love.
(fragment from the last letter)


Karl von Eckhartshausen (1752-1803) was an 18th century German mystic who wrote extensively on esoteric topics. This work, The Cloud Upon the Sanctuary, is Christian mysticism veiled in hermetic code. Eckhartshausen was briefly a member of the Bavarian Illuminati, but left for spiritual reasons. He cryptically mentions a "society of the Elect" which has existed from the very beginning of time, "the invisible celestial Church." He predicted that "it is the society whose members form a theocratic republic, which one day will be the Regent Mother of the whole World." --J.B. Hare