Εμφάνιση αναρτήσεων με ετικέτα Cagliostro. Εμφάνιση όλων των αναρτήσεων
Εμφάνιση αναρτήσεων με ετικέτα Cagliostro. Εμφάνιση όλων των αναρτήσεων

Τρίτη 19 Μαρτίου 2019

Cagliostro ''Famous imposters by Bram Stoker (1847-1912)''


Cagliostro ''Famous imposters by Bram Stoker (1847-1912)''

The individual known to history as Comte Cagliostro, or more familiarly as Cagliostro, was of the family name of Balsamo and was received into the Church under the saintly name of Joseph. The familiarity of history is an appanage of greatness in some form. Greatness is in no sense a quality of worth or morality. It simply points to publicity, and if unsuccessful, to infamy. Joseph Balsamo was of poor parentage in the town of Palermo, Sicily, and was born in 1743. In his youth he did not exhibit any talent whatever, such volcanic forces as he had being entirely used in wickedness-base, purposeless, sordid wickedness, from which devolved no benefit to any one-even to the the criminal instigator. In order to achieve greatness, or publicity, in any form, some remarkable quality is necessary; Joseph Balsamo's claim was based not on isolated qualities but on a union of many. In fact he appears to have had every necessary ingredient for this kind of success-except one, courage. 

In his case however, the lacking ingredient in the preparation of his hell-broth was supplied by luck; though such luck had to be paid for at the devil's usual price failure at the last. His biographers put his leading characteristics in rather a negative than a positive way-"indolent and unruly"; but as time went on the evil became more marked-even ferae naturae, poisonous growths, and miasmatic conditions have to manifest themselves or to cease to prevail. In the interval between young boyhood and coming manhood, Balsamo's nature-such as it was-began to develop, unscrupulousness working on an imaginative basis being always a leading characteristic. The unruly boy shewed powers of becoming an unruly man, fear being the only restraining force; and indolence giving way to wickedness. When he was about fifteen he was sent to a monastery to learn chemistry and pharmacy. The boy who had manifested a tendency to "grow downwards" found the beginning of a kind of success in these studies in which, to the surprise of all, he exhibited a form of aptitude. Chemistry has certain charms to a mind like his, for in its working are many strange surprises and lurid effects not unattended with entrancing fears. These he used before long to his own pleasure in the concern of others. "When he was expelled from the religious house he led a dissolute and criminal life in Palermo. Amongst other wickednesses he robbed his uncle and forged his will. 

Here too, he comnutted a crime, not devoid of a certain humorous aspect, but which had a reflex action on his own life. Under promise of revealing a hidden treasure, he persuaded a goldworker, one Morano, to give him custody of a quantity of his wares. It was what, in criminal slang is called "a put-up job," and was worked by a gang of young thieves with Balsamo at their head. Having filled the soft head of the foolish goldsmith with ideas to suit his purpose, Joseph brought him on a treasure hunt into a cave where he was shortly surrounded by the gang dressed as fiends, who, in the victim's paralysis of fear, robbed him at their ease of some sixty ounces of gold. Morano, as might have been expected, was not satisfied with the proceedings and vowed vengeance which he tried to effect later. Balsarno's pusillanimity worked hand in hand with Morano's vindictiveness, to the effect that the culprit incontinently absconded from his native town. 

He conferred the benefit of his presence on Messina where he was naturally attracted to a noted alchemist called Althotas, to whom he became a sort of disciple. Althotas was a man of great learning, according to the measure of that time and his own occupation. He was skilled in Eastern tongues and an adept occultist. It was said that he had actually visited Mecca and Medina in the disguise of an Oriental prince. Having attached himself to Althotas, Cagliostro went with him to Malta where he persuaded the Grand Master of the Knights to supply them with a laboratory for the manufacture of gold, and also with letters of introduction which he afterwards used with much benefit to himself. From Malta he went to Rome where he employed himself in forging engravings. Like other criminals, great and small, Comte Alessandro Cagliostro-as he had now become by his own creation of nobility-had a faculty of working hard and intelligently so long as the end he aimed at was to be accomplished by crooked means. "Work in the ordinary ways of honesty he loathed and shunned; but work as a help to his nefarious schemes seemed to be a joy to him. Then he set himself up as a wonder-worker, improving as he went on all the customs and tricks of that calling. 

He sold an elixir which he said had all the potency usually attributed to such compounds but with an added efficacy all its own. He pretended to be able to transmute metals and to make himself invisible; indeed to perform all the wonders of the alchemist, the "cheap jack," and the charlatan. At Rome he became acquainted with and married a very beautiful woman, Lorenza de Feliciani, daughter of a lacemaker, round whom later biographers weave romances. According to contemporary accounts she seems to have been dowered with just such qualities as were useful in such a life as she had entered on. In addition to great and unusual beauty she was graceful, passionate, seductive, clever, plausible, soothing, and attractive in all ways dear and convincing to men. She must have had some winning charm which has lasted beyond her time, for a hundred years afterwards we find so level-headed a writer as Dr. Charles Mackay crediting her, quite unwarrantably with, amongst other good qualities, being a faithful wife. 

Her life certainly after her marriage was such that faithfulness in any form was one of the last things to expect in her. Her husband was nothing less than a swindler of a protean kind. He had had a great number of aliases before he finally fixed on Comte de Cagliostro as a uomme de guerre. He called himself successively Chevalier de Fischio, Marquis de Melina (or Melissa), Marquis de Pellegrini, Comte de Saint-German, Baron de Belmonte; together with such names as Fenix, Anna, Harat. He wrote a work somewhat of the nature of a novel called Le Grand Cophte-which he found useful later when he was pushing his scheme of a sort of new Freemasonry. After his marriage he visited several countries, Egypt, Arabia, Persia, Poland, Russia, Greece, Germany; as well as such towns as Naples, Palermo, Rhodes, Strasbourg, Paris, London, Lisbon, Vienna, Venice, Madrid, Brussels-in fact any place where many fools were crowded into a small space. In many of these he found use for the introductory letters of the Grand Master of the Knights of Malta, as well as those of other dupes from whom it was his habit to secure such letters before the inevitable crash came. 

Wherever he travelled he was accustomed to learn all he could of the manners, customs and facts of each place he was in, thus accumulating a vast stock of a certain form of knowledge which he found most useful in his chosen occupation-deceit. With regard to the last he utilised every form of human credulity which came under his notice. The latter half of the eighteenth century was the very chosen time of strange beliefs. Occultism became a fashion, especially amongst the richer classes, with the result that every form of swindle came to the fore. At this time Cagliostro, then nearing his fortieth year, began to have a widespread reputation for marvellous cures. As mysticism in all sorts of forms had a Yogue, he used all the tricks of the cult, gathering them from various countries, especially France and Germany, where the fashion was pronounced. For this trickery he used all his knowledge of the East and all the picturesque aids to credulity which he had picked up during his years of wandering; and for his "patter," such medical terminology as he had learned-he either became a doctor or invented a title for himself. 

This he interlarded with scraps of various forms of fraudulent occultism and all sorts of suggestive images of eastern quasireligious profligacy. He took much of the imagery which he used in his rituals of fraud from records of ancient Egypt. This was a pretty safe ground for his purpose, for in his time the Egypt of the past was a sealed book. It was only in 1799 that the Rosetta stone was discovered, and more than ten years from then before Dr. Young was able to translate its three inscriptions-Hieroglyphic Demotic and Greek-whence Hieroglyphic knowledge had its source. Omne ignotum. pro magnifico might well serve as a motto for all occultism, true or false. Cagliostro, whose business it was to deceive and mislead, understood this and took care that in his cabalistic forms Egyptian signs were largely mixed with the pentagon, the signs of the Zodiac, and other mysterious symbols in common use. His object was primarily to catch the eye and so arrest the intelligence of any whom he wished to impress. For this purpose he went about gorgeously dressed and with impressive appointments. In Germany for instance he always drove in a carriage with four horses with courier and equerries in striking liveries. Happily there is extant a pen picture of him by Comte de Beugnot who met him in Paris at the house of the Comtesse de la Motte: "of medium height and fairly fat, of olive colour, with short neck and round face, big protruberant eyes, a snub nose with open nostrils." This gives of him anything but an attractive picture; but yet M. de Beugnot says: "he made an impression on women whenever he came into a room." 

Perhaps his clothing helped, for it was not of a commonplace kind. De Beugnot who was manifestly a careful and intelligent observer again comes to our aid with his pen: "He wore a coiffure new in France; his hair parted in several little cadenottes (queuesor tresses) uniting at the back of the head in the form known as a 'catogan' (hair clubbed or bunched). A dress, French fashion, of iron grey, laced with gold, scarlet waistcoat broidered with bold point de spain, red breeches, a basket-hilted sword and a hat with white plumes!" Aided by these adjuncts he was a great success in Paris whither he returned in 1785. As an impostor he knew his business and played "the game" well. When he was at work he brought to bear the influence of all his "properties," amongst them a tablecloth embroidered with cabalistic signs in scarlet and the symbols of the Rosy Cross of high degree; the same mysterious emblems marked the globe without which no wizard's atelier is complete. Here too were various little Egyptian figures-"ushabtui" he would doubtless have called them had the word been in use in his day. From these he kept his dupes at a distance, guarding carefully against any discovery. 

He evidently did not fear to hurt the religious susceptibilities of any of his votaries, for not only were the crucifix and other emblems of the kind placed amongst the curios of his ritual, but he made his invocation in the form of a religious ceremony, going down on his knees and in all ways cultivating the emotions of those round him. He was aided by a young woman whom he described as pure as an angel and of great sensibility. The said young person kept her blue eyes fixed on a globe full of water. Then he proceeded to expound the Great Secret which he told his hearers had been the same since the be ginning of things and whose mystery had been guarded by Templars of the Rosy Cross, by Magicians, by Egyptians and the like. He had claimed, as the Comte Saint-German said, that he had already existed for many centuries; that he was a contemporary of Christ; and that he had predicted His crucifixion by the Jews. As statements of this kind were made mainly for the purpose of selling the elixir which he peddled, it may easily be imagined that he did not shrink from lying or blasphemy when such seemed to suit his purpose. Daring and recklessness in his statements seemed to further his business success, so prophecy-or rather boastings of prophecy after the event-became part of the great fraud. Amongst other things he said that he had predicted the taking of the Bastille. Such things shed a little light on the methods of such impostors, and help to lay bare the roots or principles through which they flourish. 

After his Parisian success he made a prolonged tour in France. In la Vendee he boasted of some fresh miracle-of his own doing-on each day; and at Lyons the boasting was repeated. Of course he occasionally had bad times, for now and again even the demons on whose acquaintance and help he prided himself did not work. In London after 1772, things had become so bad with him that he had to work as a house painter under his own name. Whatever may have been his skill in his art this was probably about the only honest work he ever did. He did not stick to it for long however, for four years afterwards he lost three thousand pounds by frauds of others by whom he was introduced to fictitious lords and ladies. Here too he underwent a term of imprisonment for debt. Naturally such an impostor found in Freemasonry, which is a secret cult, a way of furthering his ends. With the aid of his wife, who all through their life together seems to have worked with him, he founded a new branch of freemasonry in which a good many rules of that wonderful organisation were set at defiance. As the purpose of the new cult was to defraud, its net was enlarged by taking women into the body. 

The name used for it was the Grand Egyptian Lodge-he being himself the head of it under the title of the Cophie and his wife the Grand Priestess. In the ritual were some appalling ceremonies, and as these made eventually for profitable publicity, the scheme was a great success-and the elixir sold well. This elixir was the backbone of his revenue; and indeed it would have been well worthy of success if it had been all that he claimed for it. Dispensers of elixirs are not usually backward in proclaiming the virtues of their wares; but in his various settings forth Cagliostro went further than others. He claimed not only to restore youth and health and to make them perpetual, but to restore lost innocence and effect a whole moral regeneration. No wonder that he achieved success and that money rolled in! And no wonder that women, especially of the upper classes, followed him like a flock of sheep! No wonder that a class rich, idle, pleasure loving, and fond of tasting and testing new sensations, found thrilling moments in the great impostor's melange of mystery, religion, fear, and hope; of spirit-rapping and a sort of "black mass" in which Christianity and Paganism mingled freely, and where life and death, good and evil, whirled together in a maddening dance. It was not, however, through his alleged sorcery that Cagliostro crept into a place in history; but by the association of his name with a sordid crime which involved the names of some of the great ones of the earth. The story of the Queen's Necklace, though he was acquitted at the trial which concluded it, will be remembered when the vapourings of the unscrupulous quack who had escaped a thousand penalties justly earned, have been long forgotten. Such is the irony of history! 

The story of the necklace involved Marie Antoinette, Cardinal Prince de Rohan, Comte de la Motte an officer of the private guard of "Monsieur" ( the Comte d'Artois), his wife Jeanne de Valois, descended from Henry II through Saint-Remy, his natural son and Nicole de Savigny. Louis XV had ordered from MM. Boemer et Bassange, jewellers to the Court of France, a beautiful necklace of extraordinary value for his mistress Madame du Barry, but died before it was completed. The du Barry was exiled by his successor, so the necklace remained on the hands of its makers. It was, however, of so great intrinsic value that they could not easily find a purchaser. They offered it to Marie Antoinette for one million eight hundred thousand livres; but the price was too high even for a queen, and the necklace remained on hand. So Boemer showed it to Madame de la Motte and offered to give a commission on the sale to whoever should find a buyer. She induced her husband, Comte de la Motte, to join with her in a plot to accomplish the sale. De la Motte was a friend of Cagliostro, and he too was brought in as he had influence with the Cardinal Prince de Rohan whom they looked on as a likely person to be of service. 

He had his own ambitions to acquire influence over the queen and use her for political purposes as Mazarin had used Anne of Austria. De Rohan was then a man of fifty-not considered much of an age in these days, but the Cardinal's life had not made for comparative longevity. He was in fact something of that class of fool which has no peer in folly-an old fool; and Jeanne de la Motte fooled him to the top of his bent. She pretended to him that Marie Antoinette was especially friendly to her, and shewed him letters from the queen to herself all of which had been forged for the purpose. As at this time Madame de la Motte had borrowed or otherwise obtained from the Cardinal a hundred and twenty thousand livres, she felt assured he could be used for the contemplated fraud. She probably had not ever even spoken to the queen but she was not scrupulous in such a small matter as one more untruth. She finally persuaded him that Marie Antoinette wished to purchase the necklace through his agency, he acting for her and buying it in her name. To aid in the scheme she got her pet forger, Retaux de Vilette, to prepare a receipt signed "Marie Antoinette de France." The Cardinal fell into the trap and obtained the jewel, giving to Boemer four bills due successively at intervals of six months. At Versailles de Rohan gave the casket containing the necklace to Madame de la Motte, who in his presence handed it to a valet of the royal household for conveyance to the queen. 

The valet was none other than the forger Retaux de Vilette. Madame de la Motte sent to the Cardinal a letter by the same forger asking him to meet her (the queen) in the shrubbery at Versailles between eleven o'clock and midnight. To complete the deception a girl was procured, one Olivia, who in figure resembled the queen sufficiently to pass for her in the dusk. The meeting between de Rohan and the alleged queen was held at the Baths of Apollo-to the deception and temporary satisfaction of the ambitious churchman. When the first instalment for the purchase of the necklace was due, Boemer tried to find out if the queen really had possession of the necklace-which had in the meanwhile been brought to London, it was said, by Comte de la Motte. As Boemer could not manage to get an audience with the queen he came to the conclusion that he had been robbed, and made the matter public. This was reported to M. de Breteuil, Master of the King's household, and an enemy of de Rohan. De Breteuil saw the queen secretly and they agreed to act in concert in the matter. Louis XVI asked for details of the purchase from Boemer, who told the truth so far as he knew it, producing as a proof the alleged receipt of the queen. Louis pointed out to him that he should have known that the queen did not sign after the manner of the document. He then asked de Rohan, who was Grand Almoner of France, for his written justification. 

This being supplied, he had him arrested and sent to the Bastille. Madame de la Motte accused Cagliostro of the crime, alleging that he had persuaded de Rohan to buy the necklace. She was also arrested as were Retaux de Vilette, and, later on at Brussels, Olivia, who threw some light on the fraud. The King brought the whole matter before Parliament, which ordered a prosecution. As the result of the trial which followed, Comte de la Motte and Retaux de Vilette were banished for life; Jeanne de la Motte was condemned to make amende honourable, to be whipped and branded with V on both shoulders, and to be imprisoned for life. Olivia and Cagliostro were acquitted. The Cardinal was cleared of all charges. Nothing seems to have been done for the poor jewellers, who, after all, had received more substantial injury than any of the others, having lost nearly two million livres. After the affair of the Necklace, Cagliostro spent a time in the Bastille and when free, after some months, he and his wife travelled again in Europe. In 1789 he was arrested at Rome by order of the Inquisition and condemned to death as a Freemason. The punishment was later commuted to perpetual imprisonment. He ended his days in the Chateau de Saint-Leon near Rome. His wife was condemned to perpetual seclusion and died in the Convent of Sainte-Appolive.

Πέμπτη 14 Μαρτίου 2019

Goethe’s Investigation of Cagliostro’s Identity


Goethe’s Investigation of Cagliostro’s Identity

The Impact of Cagliostro on World History

The Affair of the Necklace of 1786 was the single event that most contemporaries believed caused the revolution of 1789. At the heart of this was a forged purchase contract for a very expensive diamond necklace. The queen supposedly signed this contract. The signature duped Prince De Rohan to guarantee the purchase in January 1785. It also caused the jeweler to turn over the necklace to De Rohan. After the jeweler delivered the necklace, Cagliostro’s secretary, La Motte, said Cagliostro eventually cut it up.1 It was initially taken away by Villette, a member of the lode Amis Reunis.2

How did the story break? Cagliostro’s secretary, La Motte, came forward and told the jeweler before anyone else knew that this was a swindle.3 Comte Beugnot, a neutral in this, was with La Motte when De Rohan was arrested. She told Beugnot: “It’s Cagliostro from start to finish.”4 Later, when La Motte was interviewed, she again implicated Cagliostro as the criminal behind this theft.5 During the trial, Cagliostro’s secretary, La Motte, further said Cagliostro must have forged the document and cut it up in pieces.6 However, a critical event took place the forged contract was stolen from the court file.7 Cagliostro at the same time denied he was a forger and claimed a high birth, and rich background.
No one was able to determine Cagliostro’s true identity during the trial, or whether he had a criminal background as a forger. As a result, Cagliostro escaped conviction.
The reason no one could prove this is that the prosecution did not want to prove this. Unbeknownst to the king, the prosecutor he assigned — Baudard de Saint-James8 — was a leading member of Cagliostro lodge system as well as the Amis Reunis:

Sainte-James (de), l’un des fondateurs du Rite des philalètes en 1773 [i.e., Amis Reunis]; Grand-Chancelier dans  la Mère-Loge du Rite égyptien de Cagliostro en 1785.9

Cagliostro admitted at trial, on examination by La Motte’s counsel, that Saint-James told Cagliostro before his arrest that La Motte had implicated him, and Cagliostro would soon be arrested and his living quarters thoroughly searched.10 All La Motte’s attorney knew is this could explain why nothing incriminating was found at Cagliostro’s house. What escaped anyone’s notice at the time is the motive for Saint-James to help Cagliostro avoid detection.

Thus, Cagliostro was absolutely confident that he could lie at trial and never be exposed. His secret lodge brother of a peculiar fraternal order headed by Cagliostro was the Prosecutor!
Thereby, Cagliostro at trial besides throwing all the blame on his secretary, Mme. La Motte, was able to haughtily imply the queen indeed signed the contract. And the queen supposedly had led along the amorous attentions of Prince De Rohan which explained De Rohan’s guarantee. France was thereby led to suspect the Queen Marie Antoinette was throwing away money to buy expensive necklaces or was illicitly seeking suitors to pay for the same. The press of 1786 used this to attack the Monarchy. It indeed was the biggest shock prior to 1789 that undermined the prestige of the Monarchy. Cagliostro was the one who gave the case a political spin by making these accusations.

As a result of Cagliostro’s spin, Talleyrand, a revolution supporter in 1789, remarked prior to 1789: “I should be nowise surprised if it [the Affair of the Necklace] should overturn the French monarchy.”11 Henri Martin in 1866 wrote that the Affair of the Necklace “was destined to consummate the discredit of the royal family, and to accelerate the fall of the throne.”12

As a result, the renown writer Alexander Dumas wrote a famous work entitled Giuseppe Balsamo which he said was intended as “a serious work, rather than a romance” in order to dramatize the role of the Illuminati. He said of his work Giuseppe Balsamo: “I have written the history of the Illuminati...enemies of royal power—... [who] played a large part in the French Revolution....”13

Goethe Verifies Cagliostro’s True Identity & Background

It turns out that Goethe’s personal investigation in Palermo proves Cagliostro escaped responsibility at the Paris trial of 1786 by lying about his identity. This perjury covered up a forgery conviction back in Italy.
In 1787, Goethe, the famous author, made a journey to Italy. In his journal, he outlines how he proved satisfactorily the identity of Cagliostro as Balsamo — and that he was a lowborn Sicilian later convicted as a forger in Palermo, Sicily.14 Goethe was able to do this on a trip in April 1787 to Palermo.

First, upon arrival in Palermo, Goethe asked a guest at his hotel about Giuseppe Balsamo. “One of the guests responded to me that the portrait of Cagliostro had been circulated to Palermo as it had been to all the towns of Europe, and some persons had recognized the features of Cagliostro [in the portrait] as Joseph Balsamo.”15 Then it was explained to Goethe that the French Minister hired an attorney in Palermo to investigate the lineage of Balsamo. Goethe asked the guest to direct him to this lawyer, which the guest then did so.
Next, Goethe met with the lawyer, who treated Goethe kindly. “Having already sent,” Goethe wrote, “this genealogy and memoir [to Paris], he confided to me that he kept a copy of these legal documents just in case he ever had any need. Here is an extract of what he made:

[141] Joseph  [i.e., Giuseppe] Balsamo was born at Palermo within the early days of June 1743 who  had  as a godmother a sister  of his grand-mother, on his paternal side,  whose husband was named Joseph [i.e., Giuseppe] Cagliostro, from the vicinity of Messina. This  godmother and  great-aunt had  given him  the baptismal name of her husband [i.e., Giuseppe], which is what  undoubtedly suggested to him much later of taking  equally the name of the family  [i.e., Cagliostro]. His father, Peter  Balsamo, a book-seller  at Palermo, died  at 45 years,  and  left his widow no resources and  two children, namely Joseph  [i.e., Giuseppe] and  a daughter named Jeanne.

....As to Joseph  [i.e., Giuseppe] Balsamo, since his adolescence, he took the habit of the Brothers of Mercy,  a special order  that  tried  to heal maladies. His vivacity and  great aptitude for medicine, which was remarked favorably upon, was not enough to overcome the reverend  fathers being  forced  to dismiss him  for misconduct. [142] As a means of subsistence, he commenced to make  magic  and  seek for treasure. He developed...the facility of copying handwriting in order  to falsify ancient documents and  fabricate frauds. One of these  documents led to a serious prosecution, and  he was found guilty,  and  thrown in prison. Yet, he found a means of escape, and  he was judged in absentia.

The fugitive traveled to Calabria, and  then landed in Rome where he then married the daughter of a manufacturer of belts.  After this marriage, he left with  his wife for Naples, under the name of Count Pellegrini. He then had  the audacity to return to Palermo under this  assumed name. There, he made  the acquaintance of a young  Sicilian prince.... 
Dona Lorenza, the name of the woman [wife] of Balsamo, captivated the goodwill of the prince, to the point he declared openly and proudly he was the protector of the couple.16

At this point Goethe discusses details of the discovery of Balsamo’s identity, the resurrection of the original charges for fraud over documents, Balsamo’s arrest, etc. Then the Sicilian prince stands by Balsamo, etc. Balsamo is freed again. No one can determine under what pretext, as there was no judicial act releasing him, etc.
Goethe obtained further from the lawyer’s secretary copies of the legal documents so he could satisfactorily verify the genealogy.
From the evidence received, Goethe concluded that Cagliostro was indeed an imposter from Palermo whose real name was Giuseppe Balsamo. Goethe then told the secretary that he wanted to meet the mother and sister of Cagliostro. The lawyer’s secretary made the introductions after some reluctance. In that afternoon, he conducted Goethe to “the home of the family of the celebrated Count Cagliostro.”17

They lived on a street named Casaro. It was a tortuous street. They lived in a house of “sickly appearance.” He met Balsamo’s sister, a woman somewhere in her 40’s, as well as the widow Capitumino. They recognized the secretary. They understood and agreed to talk about the son. Goethe then records this initial conversation:

“You know  my brother!,” [said the sister]. “All Europe knows him,”  I responded, “and  I
think you ought  to know...that he is in London and  is perfectly settled.”

“Then  I wish  to join him  this  instant,” she said.18

Then Goethe told the mother how the son was arrested, thrown in the Bastille, but now lived happily in England. Yet, all around Goethe was poverty, evident in three sick children in the house. Nevertheless, the sister confided in Goethe that on a prior visit of her brother to Palermo “he brought the sum of 14 ounces which was a great help at that moment,” and they “thought he had become rich and a signeur.”19 The sister then sought to find a letter from her brother, which made the secretary very happy to hear about. However, Goethe said “my curiosity was satisfied, and...[I told them to] dispense with the need to find the letter.” The family insisted on finding the letter. Goethe insisted he had to leave, and then the mother said:

“Tell my son I am so very happy of the message that  you brought me on his behalf,” at which point I pressed her to my heart.20

Goethe then finally left.

Goethe in 1791 Recounts the Affair of the Necklace

In 1791, Goethe (1749-1832) wrote a masonic comedy entitled The Grand Kophta (Der Gross-Cophta). While in the history books, most assumed Cagliostro was not behind La Motte’s conspiracy, Goethe tells a different story. In the story by Goethe, the hero is a young Knight who finds out that the brotherhood he joined is not aiming at altruism. It turns out to be a deception.21 Our young knight is no doubt Goethe himself. The brotherhood is obviously the Illuminati. Goethe had joined the Bavarian Illuminati in February 1783 as alias Abaris, reaching the rank of Regent — the highest grade.22 However, here in Grand Kophta Goethe is clearly expressing disillusionment.

As the story begins in Grand Kophta, Goethe identifies the lead character — the “Count” who transparently rep- resents Cagliostro in the historical event known as the Affair of the Necklace. 
The Count of Grand Kophta is a penniless adventurer running a secret brotherhood. The first grade of his secret order teaches a pure ethical code: “seek what is best for you in what is best for others.” It hooks the Knight.23
However, when the Knight reaches the second grade, as Boyle puts it, “to his horror, the Knight learns that the wisdom of the second grade is opposite to that of the first grade—it is worldly advantage and unscrupulous exploitation of others: ‘What you want men to do for you, do not for them.’”24 Then when the Knight rebels at this, the Count explains to him it was all a moral test to see his true heart. Now the Knight is ready for the third and final grade of master. The Knight “is appeased by this...reversal of appearances.”25 However, by the final act, when the Knight learns of the Count’s involvement in the plot to steal a necklace, his loyalty to the Count is “finally shattered.”26

In the account of the Affair of the Necklace interwoven in the Knight’s initiations, Goethe describes the Count as a “conscious” coonspirator with a Marchioness. She represents La Motte in the real events. The Count (=Cagliostro) “forces” the niece of the Marchioness to “impersonate the Queen” (an event that was part of the true history) to feign visions to encourage the Canon (who represented Cardinal Rohan in the real history) to believe in the amorous intentions of the Queen. The young Knight “learns of the conspiracy” and “passes the information to the authorities.” This indeed is what Goethe is doing by retelling the truth about Cagliostro’s role. In the last act in Goethe’s play, unlike in the real world, all are caught red-handed on the very night the Canon (=de Rohan) gives the Necklace to the Marchioness (=LaMotte) in anticipation of being rewarded with a “tryst” with the “spurious Queen.”27

The significance of Goethe’s play The Grand Kophta is that Goethe was trying to tell the public that they did not see the true picture of the co-responsibility of Cagliostro in defrauding the jeweler. The Affair of the Necklace obviously turned Goethe off to the Illuminati. He saw that they trained members in duplicity and self-seeking rather than exclusively in virtue. For Goethe, he could not countenance measures, such as those taken by Cagliostro, to effectuate the reform of men and the world he earnestly desired. Goethe saw it would have a corrupting influence on human character.
This rejection of the Illuminati was self-evident one month after the first performance of Grand Kophta. Goethe wrote: “All secret associations should be destroyed, whatever the consequences.”28 Thus, evidently, Goethe’s investigation into the life of Balsamo was an important pivot point in his life, causing him to reject the Illuminati and all secret societies.

Notes
1. Cagliostro, Mémoire pur le Comte de Cagliostro, accusé contre M. le procureur général, accusateur; en présence de M. le Cardinal de Rohan, de la Comtesse de la Motte et autres coaccusés (Paris: 1786) at 41 (quoting La Motte).
2. Gustave Bord, La Franc-Maçonnerie en France; des origines a 1816: Les Ouvriers de l’Idéme Révolutionnaire (1688-1771) (Paris: Libraire Nationale, 1908) (reprinted Geneva-Paris: Slatkine, 1985) at 361.
3. Simon Schama, Citizens: A Chronicle of the French Revolution (Vintage Books, 1990) at 208; Frantz Funck-Brentano, The Diamond Neck- lace (trans. Henry Sutherland Edwards) (J.P.Lipincott, 1901) at 227.
4. Claude Manceron, Age of the French Revolution (Simon & Schuster, 1989) Vol. IV Toward the Brink 1785-1787 at 71 (quoting Comte Beugnot, Memoires 1779-1815 (Paris: Hachette, 1959)). 
5. W. R. H. Trowbridge, Cagliostro Savant or Scoundrel? The true role of this splendid, tragic figure (N.Y.: University Books, 1961) at 172.
6. J.B.J. Doillot, Réponse pour La Comtesse de Valois-La Motte au Mémoire du Comte de Cagliostro (Paris: L. Cellot, 1786) at 4, 46.
7. Mossiker, The Queen’s Necklace (N.Y.: Simon & Schuster, 1961) at 593.
8. Francois Ribadeau Dumas, Cagliostro (trans. Elisabeth Abbott)(London: Allen & Unwin, 1966) at 172.
9. Grand Orient Lodge of France, ACTA LATOMORUM ou CHRONOL- OGIE DE L’HISTOIRE DE LA FRANC-MAÇONNERIE FRANÇAISE ET ÉTRANGÈRE (Ed. Dechevaux-Dumesnil)(Paris: 1815) Vol. II at 376.
10.F.Dumas, Cagliostro, at 173-74.
11.John S.C. Abbott, The History of Maria Antoinette (N.Y.: Harper & Brothers, 1849) at 105.
12.Henri Martin, History of France from the Most Remote Period to 1789 (Trans. Mary Booth) (Boston: Walker, Fuller & Co., 1866) Vol. XVI at 481.
13.Alexandre Dumas, The Memoirs of Garibaldi (1861) (Kessinger Reprint, 2006) at 19.
14.J.W.Goethe, Memoires de Goethe: Traduction Nouvelle (Paris: G. Charpentier, 1886) Vol. 2 Voyages at 140-46. Available at Gallica.
15.Goethe, id., at 140-41.
16.Id., at 14-41.
17.Id., at 143.
18.Id., at 144.
19.Id., at 145.
20.Id., at 146.
21.Nicholas Boyle, Goethe: Revolution and renunciation (1790-1803)(Oxford University Press, 2000) at 274. The synopsis that fol- lows is likewise from Boyle’s book.
22.Terry Melanson, Perfectibilists (2009) at 311, citing Schüttler’s online version of Die Mitglieder des Illuminatenordens 1776-1787/93 (Munich: 1991).
23.Boyle, id., at 173.
24.Boyle, id., at 174.
25.Id.
26.Id.
27.Nicholas Boyle, id., at 172.
28.Boyle, Goethe, id., at 173.

From the book : Illuminati Manifesto of World Revolution (1792) By Nicholas Bonneville

Τρίτη 26 Ιουνίου 2018

Was Cagliostro a Charlatan? by Helena P. Blavatsky



Was Cagliostro a Charlatan? by Helena P. Blavatsky

WAS CAGLIOSTRO A " CHARLATAN "?

To send the injured unredressed away,
How great soe'er the offender, and the wrong'd
Howe'er obscure, is wicked, weak and vile Degrades,
defiles, and should dethrone a king.

Smollett

THE mention of Cagliostro's name produces a two-fold effect. With the one party, a whole sequence of marvelous events emerges from the shadowy past ; with others the modern progeny of a too realistic age, the name of Alexander, Count Cagliostro, provokes wonder, if not contempt. People are unable to understand that this " enchanter and magician " (read " Charlatan ") could ever legitimately produce such an impression as he did on his contemporaries. This gives the key to the posthumous reputation of the Sicilian known as Joseph Balsamo, that reputation which made a believer in him a brother Mason say, that (like Prince Bismarck and some Theosophists) " Cagliostro might well be said to be the best abused and most hated man in Europe." Nevertheless, and notwithstanding the fashion of loading him with opprobrious names, none should forget that Schiller and Goethe were among his great admirers, and remained so to their deaths. Goethe while travelling in Sicily devoted much labour and time to collecting information about " Guiseppe Balsamo " in his supposed native land ; and it was from these copious notes that the author of Faust wrote his play " The Great Kophta." Why this wonderful man is receiving so little honour in England, is due to Carlyle. The most fearlessly truthful historian of his age-he, who abominated falsehood under whatever appearance-has stamped with the imprimatur of his honest and famous name, and thus sanctified the most iniquitous of historical injustices ever perpetrated by prejudice and bigotry. This owing to false reports which almost to the last emanated from a class he disliked no less than he hated untruth, namely the Jesuits, or-lie incarnate. The very name of Guiseppe Balsamo, which, when rendered by cabalistic methods, means " He who was sent," or " The Given," also " Lord of the Sun," shows that such was not his real patronymic. As Kenneth R. H. Mackenzie, F.T.S., remarks, toward the end of the last century it became the fashion with certain theosophical professors of the time to transliterate into Oriental form every name provided by Occult Fraternities for disciples destined to work in the world. Whosoever then, may have been Cagliostro's parents, their name was not  Balsamo." So much is certain, at any rate. Moreover, as all know that in his youth he lived with, and was instructed by, a man named, as is supposed, Althotas, "a great Hermetic Eastern Sage " or in other words an Adept, it is not difficult to accept the tradition that it was the latter who gave him his symbolical name. But that which is known with still more certainty is the extreme esteem in which he was held by some of the most scientific and honoured men of his day. In France we find Cagliostro,-having before served as a confidential friend and assistant chemist in the laboratory of Pinto, the Grand Master of the Knights of Malta-becoming the friend and protege of the Prince Cardinal de Rohan. A high born Sicilian Prince honoured him with his support and friendship, as did many other noblemen. " Is it possible, then," pertinently asks Mackenzie, " that a man of such engaging manners could have been the lying impostor his enemies endeavoured to prove him ? " The chief cause of his life-troubles was his marriage with Lorenza Feliciani, a tool of the Jesuits ; and two minor causes his extreme good nature, and the blind confidence he placed in his friends-some of whom · became traitors and his bitterest enemies neither of the crimes of which he is unjustly accused could lead to the destruction of his honour and posthumous reputation ; but all was due to his weakness for an unworthy woman, and the possession of certain secrets of nature, which he would not divulge to the Church. Being a native of Sicily, Cagliostro was naturally born in a family of Roman Catholics, no matter what their name, and was brought up by monks of the " Good Brotherhood of Castiglione," as his biographers tell us ; thus, for the sake of dear life he had to outwardly profess belief in and respect for a Church, whose traditional policy has ever been, " he who is not with us is against us," and forthwith to crush the enemy in the bud. And yet, just for this, is Cagliostro even to-day accused of having served the Jesuits as their spy ; and this by Masons who ought to be the last to bring such a charge against a learned Brother who was persecuted by the Vatican even more as a Mason than as an Occultist. Had it been so, would these same Jesuits even to this day vilify his name ? Had he served them, would he not have proved himself useful to their ends, as a man of such undeniable intellectual gifts could not have blundered or disregarded the orders of those whom he served. But instead of this, what do we see ? Cagliostro charged with being the most cunning and successful impostor and charlatan of his age ; accused of belonging to the Jesuit Chapter of Clermont in France ; of appearing (as a proof of his affiliation to the Jesuits) in clerical dress at Rome. Yet, this " cunning impostor " is tried and condemned-by the exertions of those same Jesuits-to an ignominious death, which was changed only subsequently to life-long imprisonment, owing to a mysterious interference or influence brought to bear on the Pope ! Would it not be more charitable and consistent with truth to say that it was his connection with Eastern Occult Science, his knowledge of many secrets--deadly to the Church of Rome-that brought upon Cagliostro first the persecution of the Jesuits, and finally the rigour of the Church ? It was his own honesty, which blinded him to the defects of those whom he cared for, and led him to trust two such rascals as the Marquis Agliato and Ottavio Nicastro, that is at the bottom of all the accusations of fraud and imposture now lavished upon him. And it is the sins of these two worthies-subsequently executed for gigantic swindles and murder-which are now made to fall on Cagliostro. Nevertheless it is known that he and his wife (in 1770) were both left destitute by the flight of Agliato with all their funds, so that they had to beg their way through Piedmont and Geneva. Kenneth Mackenzie has well proven that Cagliostro had never mixed himself up with political intrigue -the very soul of the activities of the Jesuits. " He was most certainly unknown in that capacity to those who have jealously guarded the preparatory archives of the Revolution, and his appearance as an advocate of revolutionary principles has no basis in fact." He was simply an Occultist and a Mason, and as such he was allowed to suffer at the hands of those who, adding insult to injury, first tried to kill him by life long imprisonment and then spread the rumour that he had been their ignoble agent. This cunning device was in its infernal craft well worthy of its primal originators. There are many landmarks in Cagliostro's biographies to show that he taught the Eastern doctrine of the " principles " in man, of " God " dwelling in mao-as a potentiality in actu (the " Higher Self")-and in every living thing and even atom-as a potentiality in posse, and that he served the Masters of a Fraternity he would not name because on account of his pledge he could not. His letter to the new mystical but rather motley Brotherhood the (Lodge of) Philalethes, is a proof in point. The Philalethes, as all Masons know, was a rite founded in Paris in 1 773 in the Loge des A mis Reu1zis, based on the principles of Martinism, and whose members made a special study of the Occult Sciences. The Mother Lodge was a philosophical and theosophical Lodge, and therefore Cagliostro was right in desiring to purify its progeny, the Lodge of Philalethes. This is what the Royal Masonic Cyclopcedia says on the subject :-

“. . . on the 15th of February, 1785, the Lodge of Philalethes (or Lovers of Truth), in solemn Session – with Savalette de Langes, royal treasurer; Tassin, the banker, and Tassin, an officer in the royal service – opened a Fraternal Convention at Paris . . . Princes (Russian, Austrian, and others), fathers of the Church, councillors, knights, financiers, barristers, barons, Theosophists, canons, colonels, professors of magic, engineers, literary men, doctors, merchants, postmasters, dukes, ambassadors, surgeons, teachers of languages, receivers general, and notably two London names – Boosie, a merchant, and Brooks of London – compose this Convention, to whom may be added M. le Comte de Cagliostro, and Mesmer, ‘the inventor’, as Thory describes him (Acta Latomorum, Vol. II. p. 95), ‘of the doctrine of magnetism!’ Surely such an able set of men to set the world to rights, as France never saw before or since!” 

The grievance of the Lodge was that Cagliostro, who had first promised to take charge of it, withdrew his offers, as the " Convention " would not adopt the Constitutions of the Egyptian Rite, nor would the Philaletlus content to have its archives consigned to the flames, which were his conditions sine qua non. It is strange that his answer to that Lodge should be regarded by Brother K. R. H. Mackenzie and other Masons as emanating " from a Jesuit source." The very style is Oriental, and no European Mason-least of all a Jesuit-would write in such a manner. This is how the answer runs':- 

. . . " The unknown grand Master of true Masonry has cast his eyes upon the Philaletheans ... Touched by the sincere avowal of their desires, he deigns to extend his hand over them, and consents to give a ray of light into the darkness of their temple. It is the wish of the Unknown Great Master, to prove to them the existence of one God-the basis of their faith ; the original dignity of man,· this powers and destiny ... . It is by deeds and facts, by the testimony of the senses, that they will know GOD, MAN and the intermediary spiritual beings (principles) existing between them,· of which true Masonry gives the symbols and indicates the real road. Let then, the Philalethes embrace the doctrines of this real Masonry, submit to the rules of its supreme chief, and adopt its constitutions. But above all let the Sanctuary be purified, let the Philalethes know that light can only descend into the Temple of Faith (based on knowledge), not into that of Scepticism. Let them devote to the flames that vain accumulation of their archives ; for it is only on the ruins of the Tower of Confusion that the Temple of Truth can be erected." In the Occult phraseology of certain Occultists " Father, Son and Angels " stood for the compound symbol of physical, and astra-Spiritual MAN.* John G. Gichtel (end of XVIIth cent.), the ardent lover of Boehme, the Seer of whom St. Martin relates that he was married " to the heavenly Sophia," the Divine Wisdom-made use of this term. Therefore, it is easy to see what Cagliostro meant by proving to the Philalethes on the testimony of ·their " senses," " God, man and the intermediary Spiritual beings," that exist between God (Atma), and Man (the Ego). Nor is it more difficult to understand his true meaning when he reproaches the Brethren in his parting letter which says : " We have offered you the truth ; you have disdained it. We have offered it for the sake of itself, and you have refused it in consequence of a love of forms. · · Can you elevate yourselves to (your) God and the knowledge of yourself,es by the assistance of a Secretary and a Convocation ?" etc.

Many are the absurd and entirely contradictory statements about Joseph Balsamo, Count de Cagliostro, so-called, several of which were incorporated by Alexander Dumas in his Memoires d'un Medicin, with those prolific variations of truth and fact which so characterize Dumas pert's romances. But though the world is in possession of a most miscellaneous and varied mass of information concerning that remarkable and unfortunate man during most of his life, yet of the last ten years and of his death, nothing certain is known, save only the legend that he died in the prison of the Inquisition. True, some fragments published recently by the Italian savant, Giovanni Sforza, from the private correspondence of Lorenzo Prospero Bottini, the Roman ambassador of the Republic of Lucca at the end of the last century, have somewhat filled this wide gap. This correspondence with Pietro Calandrini, the Great Chancellor of the said Republic, begins from 1784, but the really interesting information commences only in 1789, in a letter dated June 6, of that year, and even then we do not learn much. It speaks of the " celebrated Count di Cagliostro, who has recently arrived with his wife from Trent vid Turin to Rome. People say he is a native of Sicily and extremely wealthy, but no one knows whence that wealth. He has a letter of introduction from the Bishop . of Trent to Albani... So far his daily walk in life as well as his private and public status are above reproach. Many are those seeking an interview with him, to hear from his own lips the corroboration of what is being said of him." From another letter we learn that Rome had proven an ungrateful soil for Cagliostro. He had the intention of settling at Naples, but the plan could not be realised. The Vatican authorities who had hitherto left the Count undisturbed, suddenly laid their heavy hand upon him. In a letter dated 2 January, 1790, just a year after Cagliostro's arrival, it is stated that : " last Sunday secret and extraordinary debates in council took place at the Vatican." It (the council) consisted of the State Secretary and Antonelli, Pillotta and Campanelli, Monsignor Figgerenti performing the duty of Secretary. The object of that Secret Council remains unknown, but public rumour asserts that it was called forth owing to the sudden arrest on the night between Saturday and Sunday, of the Count di Cagliostro, his wife, and a Capuchin, Fra Giuseppe Maurijio. The Count is incarcerated in Fort St. Angelo, the Countess in the Convent of St. Apollonia, and the monk in the prison of Araceli. That monk, who calls himself ' Father Swizzero,' is regarded as a confederate of the famous magician. In the number of the crimes he is accused of is included that of the circulation of a book by an unknown author, condemned to public burning and entitled, ' The Three Sisters.' The object of this work is ' to pulverize certain three high-born individuals.' " The real meaning of this most extraordinary misinterpretation is easy 'to guess. It was a work on Alchemy ; the " three sisters " standing symbolically for the three " Principles " in their duplex symbolism. On the plane of occult chemistry they " pulverize " the triple ingredient used in the process of the transmutation of metals ; on the plane of Spirituality they reduce to a state of pulverization the three " lower" personal " principles " in man, an explanation that every Theosophist is bound to understand. The trial of Cagliostro lasted for a long time. In a letter of March the 17th, Bottini writes to his Lucca correspondent that the famous " wizard " has finally appeared before the Holy Inquisition. The real cause of the slowness of the proceedings was that the Inquisition, with all its dexterity at fabricating proofs, could find no weighty evidence to prove the guilt of Cagliostro. Nevertheless, on April the 7th I 79 I he was condemned to death. He was accused of various and many crimes, the chiefest of which were his being a Mason and an " Illuminate," an " Enchanter " occupied with unlawful studies ; he was also accused of deriding the holy Faith, of doing harm to society, of possessing himself by means unknown of large sums of · money, and of inciting others, sex, age and social standing notwithstanding, to do the same. In short, we find the unfortunate Occultist condemned to an ignominous death for deeds committed, the like of which are daily and publicly committed now-adays, by more than one Grand Master of the Masons, as also by hundreds of thousands of Kabbalists and Masons, mystically inclined. After this verdict the " arch heretic's " documents, diplomas from foreign Courts and Societies, Masonic regalias and family relics were solemnly burned by the public hangmen in the Piazza della Minerva, before enormous crowds of people. First his books and instruments were consumed. Among these was the MS. on the Maconnerie Egyptienne, which thus can no longer serve as a witness in favour of the reviled man. And now the condemned Occultist had to be passed over to the hands of the civil Tribunal, when a mysterious event happened. A stranger, never seen by any one before or after in the Vatican, appeared and demanded a private audience of the Pope, sending him by the Cardinal Secretary a word instead of a name. He was immediately received, but only stopped with the Pope for a few minutes. Jli"o sooner was he gone than his Holiness gave orders to commute· the death sentence of the Count to that of imprisonment for life, in the fortress called the Castle of St. Leo, and that the whole transaction should be conducted in great secresy. The monk Swizzero was condemned to ten years' imprisonment ; and the Countess Cagliostro was set at liberty, but only to be confined on a new charge of heresy in a convent. But what was the Castle of St. Leo ? It now stands on the frontiers of Tuscany and was then in the Papal States, in the Duchy of I: rhino. It is built on the top of an enormous rock, almost perpendicular on all sides ; to get into the " Castle " in those days, one had to enter a kind of open basket which was hoisted up by ropes and pulleys. As to the
criminal, he was placed in a special box, after which the jailors pulled him up " with the rapidity of the wind." On April 23rd 1792 Giuseppe Balsamo-if so we must call him-ascended heavenward in the criminal's box, incarcerated in that living tomb for life. Giuseppe Balsamo is mentioned for the last time in the Bottini correspondence in a letter dated March off 1792. The ambassador speaks of a marvel produced by Cagliostro in his prison during his leisure hours. A long rusty nail taken by the prisoner out of the floor was transformed by him without the help of any instrument into a sharp triangular stiletto, as smooth, brilliant and sharp as if it were made of the finest ;;teel. It was recognized for an old nail only by its head, left by the prisoner to serve as a handle. The State Secretary gave orders to have it taken away from Cagliostro, and brought to Rome, and to double the watch over him. And now comes the last kick of the jackass at the dying or dead lion. Luiggi Angiolini, a Tuscan diplomat, writes as follows : " At last, that same Cagliostro, who made so many believe that he had been a contemporary of Julius cesar, who reached such fame and so many friends, died from apoplexy, August 26, 1795. · Semironi had him buried in a wood-barn below, whence peasants used to pilfer constantly the crown property. The crafty chaplain reckoned very justly that the man who had inspired the world with such superstitious fear while living, would inspire people with the same feelings after his death, and thus keep the thieves at bay .... " But yet-a query ! Was Cagliostro dead and buried indeed in 1792, at St. Leo ? And if so, why should the custodians at the Castle of St. Angelo, of 1Rome show innocent tourists the little square hole in which Cagliostro is said to have been confined and " died "? Why such uncertainty or-imposition, and such disagreement in the legend ? Then there are Masons who to this day tell strange stories in Italy. Some say that Cagliostro escaped in an unaccountable way from his aerial prison, and thus forced his jailors to spread the news of his death and burial. Others maintain that he not only escaped, but, thanks to the Elixir of Life, still lives on, though over twice three score and ten years old ! " Why " asks Bottini, " if he really possessed the powers he claimed, has he not indeed vanished from his jailors, and thus escaped the degrading punishment altogether ?" We have heard of another prisoner, greater in every respect than Cagliostro ever claimed to be. Of that prisoner too, it was said in mocking tones, " He saved others ; himself he cannot save. . . . . let him now come down from the cross, and we will believe ... .'' How long shall charitable people build the biographies of the living and ruin the reputations of the dead, with such incomparable unconcern, by means of idle and often entirely false gossip of people, and these generally the slaves of prejudice ! So long, we are forced to think, as they remain ignorant of the Law of Karma and its iron justice. 

H. P. B.

Famous imposters by Bram Stoker (1847-1912) - Cagliostro


Famous imposters by Bram Stoker (1847-1912) 
Cagliostro

ΤHE individual known to history as Comte  Cagliostro, or more familiarly as Cagliostro,  was of the family name of Balsamo and  was received into the Church under the saintly  name of Joseph. The familiarity of history is an appanage of greatness in some form. Greatness  is in no sense a quality of worth or morality. It  simply points to publicity, and if unsuccessful, to  infamy. Joseph Balsamo was of poor parentage  in the town of Palermo, Sicily, and was born in  1743. In his youth he did not exhibit any talent  whatever, such volcanic forces as he had being entirely  used in wickedness—base, purposeless, sordid wickedness, from which devolved no benefit  to any one—even to the the criminal instigator. In  order to achieve greatness, or publicity, in any  form, some remarkable quality is necessary; 

Joseph  Balsamo's claim was based not on isolated qualities  but on a union of many. In fact he appears to  have had every necessary ingredient for this kind  of success—except one, courage. In his case however,  the lacking ingredient in the preparation of  his hell-broth was supplied by luck; though such  luck had to be paid for at the devil's usual price failure at the last. His biographers put his leading characteristics in rather a negative than a positive way—"indolent and unruly"; but as time went on the evil became more marked—even ferae naturae, poisonous growths, and miasmatic conditions have to manifest themselves or to cease to prevail. In the interval between young boyhood and coming manhood, Balsamo's nature—such as it was—began to develop, unscrupulousness working on an imaginative basis being always a leading characteristic. 

The unruly boy shewed powers of becoming an unruly man, fear being the only restraining force ; and indolence giving way to wickedness. When he was about fifteen he was sent to a monastery to learn chemistry and pharmacy. The boy who had manifested a tendency to "grow downwards" found the beginning of a kind of success in these studies in which, to the surprise of all, he exhibited a form of aptitude. Chemistry has certain charms to a mind like his, for in its working are many strange surprises and lurid effects not unattended with entrancing fears. These he used before long to his own pleasure in the concern of others. When he was expelled from the religious house he led a dissolute and criminal life in Palermo. Amongst other wickednesses he robbed his uncle and forged his will. Here too, he committed a crime, not devoid of a certain humorous aspect, but which had a reflex action on Ms own life. Under promise of revealing a hidden treasure, he persuaded a goldworker, one Morano, to give him custody of a quantity of his wares. 

It was what, in criminal slang is called "a put-up job," and was worked by a gang of young thieves with Balsamo at their head. Having filled the soft head of the foolish goldsmith with ideas to suit his purpose, Joseph brought him on a treasure hunt into a cave where he was shortly surrounded by the gang dressed as fiends, who, in the victim's paralysis of fear, robbed him at their ease of some sixty ounces of gold. Morano, as might have been expected, was not satisfied with the proceedings and vowed vengeance which he tried to effect later. Balsamo's pusillanimity worked hand in hand with Morano's vindictiveness, to the effect that the culprit incontinently absconded from his native town. He conferred the benefit of his presence on Messina where he was naturally attracted to a noted alchemist called Althotas, to whom he became a sort of disciple. Althotas was a man of great learning, according to the measure of that time and his own occupation. He was skilled in Eastern tongues and an adept occultist. It was said that he had actually visited Mecca and Medina in the disguise of an Oriental prince. Having attached himself to Althotas, Cagliostro went with him to Malta where he persuaded the Grand Master of the Knights to supply them with a laboratory for the manufacture of gold, and also with letters of introduction which he afterwards used with much benefit to himself. 

From Malta he went to Rome where he employed himself in forging engravings. Like other criminals, great and small, Comte Alessandro Cagliostro—as he had now become by his own creation of nobility—had a faculty of working hard and intelligently so long as the end he aimed at was to be accomplished by crooked means. Work in the ordinary ways of honesty he loathed and shunned ; but work as a help to his nefarious schemes seemed to be a jojr to him. Then he set himself up as a wonder-worker, improving as he went on all the customs and tricks of that calling. He sold an elixir which he said had all the potency usually attributed to such compounds but with an added efficacy all its own. He pretended to be able to transmute metals and to make himself invisible ; indeed to perform all the wonders of the alchemist, the "cheap jack," and the charlatan. 

At Rome he became acquainted with and married a very beautiful woman, Lorenza de Feliciani, daughter of a lacemaker, round whom later biographers weave romances. According to contemporary accounts she seems to have been dowered with just such qualities as were useful in such a life as she had entered on. In addition to great and unusual beauty she was graceful, passionate, seductive, clever, plausible, soothing, and attractive in all ways dear and convincing to men. She must have had some winning charm which has lasted beyond her time, for a hundred years afterwards we find so level-headed a writer as Dr. Charles Mackay crediting her, quite unwarrantably with, amongst other good qualities, being a faithful wife. Her life certainly after her marriage was such that faithfulness in any form was one of the last things to expect in her. Her husband was nothing less than a swindler of a protean kind. He had had a great number of aliases before he finally fixed on Comte de Cagliostro as a nomine de guerre. 

He called himself successively Chevalier de Fischio, Marquis de Melina (or Melissa), Marquis de Pellegrini, Comte de SaintGerman, Baron de Belmonte; together with such names as Fenix, Anna, Harat. He wrote a work somewhat of the nature of a novel called Le Grand Cophte—which he found useful later when he was pushing his scheme of a sort of new Freemasonry. After his marriage he visited several countries, Egypt, Arabia, Persia, Poland, Russia, Greece, Germany ; as well as such towns as Naples, Palermo, Rhodes, Strasbourg, Paris, London, Lisbon, Vienna, Venice, Madrid, Brussels—in fact any place where many fools were crowded into a small space. In many of these he found use for the introductory letters of the Grand Master of the Knights of Malta, as well as those of other dupes from whom it was his habit to secure such letters before the inevitable crash came. Wherever he travelled he was accustomed to learn all he could of the manners, customs and facts of each place he was in, thus accumulating a vast stock of a certain form of knowledge which he found most useful in his chosen occupation—deceit. With regard to the last he utilised every form of human credulity which came under his notice. The latter half of the eighteenth century was the very chosen time of strange beliefs. Occultism became a fashion, especially amongst the richer classes, with the result that every form of swindle came to the fore. 

At this time Cagliostro, then nearing his fortieth year, began to have a widespread reputation for marvellous cures. As mysticism in all sorts of forms had a vogue, he used all the tricks of the cult, gathering them from various countries, especially France and Germany, where the fashion was pronounced. For this trickery he used all his knowledge of the East and all the picturesque aids to credulity which he had picked up during his years of wandering; and for his "patter," such medical terminology as he had learned—he either became a doctor or invented a title for himself. This he interlarded with scraps of various forms of fraudulent occultism and all sorts of suggestive images of eastern quasireligious profligacy. He took much of the imagery which he used in his rituals of fraud from records of ancient Egypt. This was a pretty safe ground for his purpose, for in his time the Egypt of the past was a sealed book. It was only in 1799 that the Rosetta stone was discovered, and more than ten years from then before Dr. Young was able to translate its three inscriptions—Hieroglyphic Demotic and Greek—whence Hieroglyphic knowledge had its source. Omne ignotum pro magnifico might well serve as a motto for all occultism, true or false. Cagliostro, whose business it was to deceive and mislead, understood this and took care that in his cabalistic forms Egyptian signs were largely mixed with the pentagon, the signs of the Zodiac, and other mysterious symbols in common use. His object was primarily to catch the eye and so arrest the intelligence of any whom he wished to impress. For this purpose he went about gorgeously dressed and with impressive appointments. In Germany for instance he always drove in a carriage with four horses with courier and equerries in striking liveries. Happily there is extant a pen picture of him by Comte de Beugnot who met him in Paris at the house of the Comtesse de la Motte :

"of medium height and fairly fat, of olive colour, with short neck and round face, big protruberant eyes, a snub nose with open nostrils."

This gives of him anything but an attractive picture; but yet M. de Beugnot says: "he made an impression on women whenever he came into a room." Perhaps his clothing helped, for it was not of a commonplace kind. De Beugnot who was manifestly a careful and intelligent observer again comes to our aid with his pen:

"He wore a coiffure new in France; his hair parted in several little cadenottes (queues or tresses) uniting at the back of the head in the form known as a 'catogan' (hair clubbed or bunched). A dress, French fashion, of iron grey, laced with gold, scarlet waistcoat broidered with bold point de spain, red breeches, a basket-hilted sword and a hat with white plumes I"

Aided by these adjuncts he was a great success in Paris whither he returned in 1785. As an impostor he knew his business and played "the game" well. When he was at work he brought to bear the influence of all his "properties," amongst them a tablecloth embroidered with cabalistic signs in scarlet and the symbols of the Rosy Cross of high degree; the same mysterious emblems marked the globe without which no wizard's atelier is complete. Here too were various little Egyptian figures — "ushabtui" he would doubtless have called them had the word been in use in his day. From these he kept his dupes at a distance, guarding carefully against any discovery. He evidently did not fear to hurt the religious susceptibilities of any of his votaries, for not only were the crucifix and other emblems of the kind placed amongst the curios of his ritual, but he made his invocation in the form of a religious ceremony, going down on his knees and in all ways cultivating the emotions of those round him. 

He was aided by a young woman whom he described as pure as an angel and of great sensibility. The said young person kept her blue eyes fixed on a globe full of water. Then he proceeded to expound the Great Secret which he told his hearers had been the same since the beginning of things and whose mystery had been guarded by Templars of the Rosy Cross, by Magicians, by Egyptians and the like. He had claimed, as the Comte Saint-German said, that he had already existed for many centuries; that he was a contemporary of Christ; and that he had predicted His crucifixion by the Jews. As statements of this kind were made mainly for the purpose of selling the elixir which he peddled, it may easily be imagined that he did not shrink from lying or blasphemy when such seemed to suit his purpose. Daring and recklessness in his statements seemed to further his business success, so prophecy—or rather boastings of prophecy after the event—became part of the great fraud. Amongst other things he said that he had predicted the taking of the Bastille. Such things shed a little light on the methods of such impostors, and help to lay bare the roots or principles through which they flourish. 

After his Parisian success he made a prolonged tour in France. In la Vendee he boasted of some fresh miracle—of his own doing—on each day ; and at Lyons the boasting was repeated. Of course he occasionally had bad times, for now and again even the demons on whose acquaintance and help he prided himself did not work. In London after 1772, things had become so bad with him that he had to work as a house painter under his own name. 
Whatever may have been his skill in his art this was probably about the only honest work he ever did. He did not stick to it for long however, for four years afterwards he lost three thousand pounds by frauds of others by whom he was introduced to fictitious lords and ladies. Here too he underwent a term of imprisonment for debt. Naturally such an impostor found in Freemasonry, which is a secret cult, a way of furthering his ends. With the aid of his wife, who all through their life together seems to have worked with him, he founded a new branch of freemasonry in which a good many rules of that wonderful organisation were set at defiance. As the purpose of the new cult was to defraud, its net was enlarged by taking women into the body. 

The name used for it was the Grand Egyptian Lodge—he being himself the head of it under the title of the Cophte and his wife the Grand Priestess. In the ritual were some appalling ceremonies, and as these made eventually for profitable publicity, the scheme was a great success—and the elixir sold well. This elixir was the backbone of his revenue ; and indeed it would have been well worthy of success if it had been all that he claimed for it. Dispensers of elixirs are not usually backward in proclaiming the virtues of their wares; but in his various settings forth Cagliostro went further than others. He claimed not only to restore youth and health and to make them perpetual, but to restore lost innocence and effect a whole moral regeneration. No wonder that he achieved success and that money rolled in! And no wonder that women, especially of the upper classes, followed him like a flock of sheep ! No wonder that a class rich, idle, pleasureloving", and fond of tasting and testing new sensations, found thrilling moments in the great impostor's melange of mystery, religion, fear, and hope ; of spirit-rapping and a sort of "black mass" in which Christianity and Paganism mingled freely, and where life and death, good and evil, whirled together in a maddening dance. 

It was not, however, through his alleged sorcery that Cagliostro crept into a place in history; but by the association of his name with a sordid crime which involved the names of some of the great ones of the earth. The story of the Queen's Necklace, though he was acquitted at the trial which concluded it, will be remembered when the vapourings of the unscrupulous quack who had escaped a thousand penalties justly earned, have been long forgotten. Such is the irony of history! The story of the necklace involved Marie Antoinette, Cardinal Prince de Rohan, Comte de la Motte — an officer of the private guard of "Monsieur" (the Comte d'Artois), his wife Jeanne de Valois, descended from Henry II through Saint-Remy, his natural son and Nicole de Savigny. Louis XV had ordered from MM. Boemer et Bassange, jewellers to the Court of France, a beautiful necklace of extraordinary value for his mistress Madame du Barry, but died before it was completed. The du Barry was exiled by his successor, so the necklace remained on the hands of its makers. It was, however, of so great intrinsic value that they could not easily find a purchaser. They offered it to Marie Antoinette for one million eight hundred thousand livres; but the price was too high even for a queen, and the necklace remained on hand. So Boemer showed it to Madame de la Motte and offered to give a commission on the sale to whoever should find a buyer. She induced her husband, Comte de la Motte, to join with her in a plot to accomplish the sale. 

De la Motte was a friend of Cagliostro, and he too was brought in as he had influence with the Cardinal Prince de Rohan whom they looked on as a likely person to be of service. He had his own ambitions to acquire influence over the queen and use her for political purposes as Mazarin had used Anne of Austria. De Rohan was then a man of fifty—not considered much of an age in these days, but the Cardinal's life had not made for comparative longevity. He was in fact something of that class of fool which has no peer in folly—an old fool ; and Jeanne de la Motte fooled him to the top of his bent. She pretended to him that Marie Antoinette was especially friendly to her, and shewed him letters from the queen to herself all of which had been forged for the purpose. As at this time Madame de la Motte had borrowed or otherwise obtained from the Cardinal a hundred and twenty thousand livres, she felt assured he could be used for the contemplated fraud. She probably had not ever even spoken to the queen but she was not scrupulous in such a small matter as one more untruth. She finally persuaded him that Marie Antoinette wished to purchase the necklace through his agency, he acting for her and buying it in her name. To aid in the scheme she got her pet forger, Retaux de Vilette, to prepare a receipt signed "Marie Antoinette de France." The Cardinal fell into the trap and obtained the jewel, giving to Boemer four bills due successively at intervals of six months. At Versailles de Rohan gave the casket containing the necklace to Madame de la Motte, who in his presence handed it to a valet of the royal household for conveyance to the queen. 

The valet was none other than the forger Retaux de Vilette. Madame de la Motte sent to the Cardinal a letter by the same forger asking him to meet her (the queen) in the shrubbery at Versailles between eleven o'clock and midnight. To complete the deception a girl was procured, one Olivia, who in figure resembled the queen sufficiently to pass for her in the dusk. The meeting between de Rohan and the alleged queen was held at the Baths of Apollo—to the deception and temporary satisfaction of the ambitious churchman. When the first instalment for the purchase of the necklace was due, Boemer tried to find out if the queen really had possession of the necklace—which had in the meanwhile been brought to London, it was said, by Comte de la Motte. As Boemer could not manage to get an audience with the queen he came to the conclusion that he had been robbed, and made the matter public. This was reported to M. de Breteuil, Master of the King's household, and an enemy of de Rohan. De Breteuil saw the queen secretly and they agreed to act in concert in the matter. Louis XVI asked for details of the purchase from Boemer, who told the truth so far as he knew it, producing as a proof the alleged receipt of the queen. Louis pointed out to him that he should have known that the queen did not sign after the manner of the document. He then asked de Rohan, who was Grand Almoner of France, for his written justification. 

This being supplied, he had him arrested and sent to the Bastille. Madame de la Motte accused Cagliostro of the crime, alleging that he had persuaded de Rohan to buy the necklace. She was also arrested as were Retaux de Vilette, and, later on at Brussels, Olivia, who threw some light on the fraud. The King brought the whole matter before Parliament, which ordered a prosecution. As the result of the trial which followed, Comte de la Motte and Retaux de Vilette were banished for life ; Jeanne de la Motte was con- demned to make amende honourable, to be whipped and branded with V on both shoulders, and to be imprisoned for life. Olivia and Cagliostro were acquitted. The Cardinal was cleared of all charges. Nothing seems to have been done for the poor jewellers, who, after all, had received more substantial injury than any of the others, having lost nearly two million livres. After the affair of the Necklace, Cagliostro spent a time in the Bastille and when free, after some months, he and his wife travelled again in Europe. In 1789 he was arrested at Rome by order of the Inquisition and condemned to death as a Free- mason. The punishment was later commuted to perpetual imprisonment. He ended his days in the Chateau de Saint-Leon near Rome. His wife was condemned to perpetual seclusion and died in the Convent of Sainte-Appolive.

Προβολή ταινίας Cagliostro (1949) - Παρασκευή 29 και ώρα 20:00


Προβολή ταινίας Cagliostro (1949) - Παρασκευή 29 και ώρα 20:00

Προβολή της ταινίας Cagliostro (1949) 

Παρασκευή 29 Ιουνίου και ώρα 20:00

Ελληνικοί υπότιτλοι 

Ελεύθερη είσοδος

Έναστρον Βιβλιοκαφέ - Σόλωνος 101 Αθήνα

Η ταινία Cagliostro είναι μια προσαρμογή του μυθιστορήματος του Αλεξάντερ Δουμά ''Joseph Balsamo'' που προβλήθηκε το 1949.
Η σκηνοθεσία είναι του γεννημένου στην Ρωσσία Γκρέγκορι Ρατόφ. Διαδραματίζεται τον 18ο αιώνα, και πρωταγωνιστεί ο Orson Welles στον ρόλο του Joseph Balsamo, ενός υπνωτιστή, μάγου και τσαρλατάνου, ο οποίος είναι γνωστός με το ψευδώνυμο Count Cagliostro, μαζί του παίζει η Nancy Guild ως Lorenza / Marie Antoinette. 

Orson Welles : Cagliostro
Nancy Guild : Marie Antoinette -Alias- Lorenza
Akim Tamiroff : Gitano
Frank Latimore : Gilbert de Rezel
Valentina Cortese : Zoraida
Margot Grahame : Mme. Du Barry
Stephen Bekassy : Vicomte de Montagne
Berry Kroeger : Alexandre Dumas, Sr.
Gregory Gaye : Chambord -Alias- Monk
Raymond Burr : Alexandre Dumas, Jr.
Lee Kresel : Roi Louis XVI
Charles Goldner : Dr. Franz Anton Mesmer
Robert Atkins : Roi Louis XV

Réal : Gregory Ratoff
Scén : Charles Bennet 
Scén+ : Richard Schayer 
Genre : Drame
Producteur : Gregory Ratoff
Musiques de : Paul Sawtell
Photos de : Ubaldo Arata, Anchise Brizzi et Otello Martelli
Distributeur : United Artists
Roman de : Alexandre Dumas

Ο Αλεσσάντρο Καλιόστρο (Alessandro Cagliostro, 2 Ιουνίου 1743- 26 Αυγούστου 1795) ήταν Ιταλός περιηγητής και τέκτονας. Υπήρξε σωσίας του κοινού εγκληματία Τζουζέππε Μπάλσαμο. Εγκαταλείφθηκε από τους γονείς του μόλις γεννήθηκε στη Μάλτα ενώ εκεί, όπως ισχυριζόταν ο ίδιος, μυήθηκε στη μουσική και στην αλχημεία. Νυμφεύτηκε τη Λορέντσα Φελιτσιάνι (Lorenza Feliciani) και ταξίδευσαν μαζί στο Λονδίνο, όπου και έγιναν μέλη τεκτονικής οργάνωσης.

Υιοθέτησε ως τεκτονικό σύμβολο τον ουροβόρο, δηλαδή το φίδι που δαγκώνει την ουρά του. Ίδρυσε τεκτονική στοά στην Χάγη. Έκανε ταξίδια σε Ρωσία, Γερμανία και Γαλλία και ισχυριζόταν ότι θεράπευε μέσω μαγνητισμού.

Ενώ βρισκόταν στο Παρίσι, η φήμη του απλώθηκε και του πρότειναν να γίνει γιατρός του Βενιαμίν Φραγκλίνου. Διώχθηκε ποινικά μετά την εμπλοκή του στην υπόθεση με το αδαμάντινο περιδέραιο της Βασίλισσας Μαρίας Αντουανέτας και φυλακίστηκε για εννέα μήνες στη Βαστίλη, για απάτη. Τελικά αθωώθηκε, καθώς δε βρέθηκαν αποδεικτικά στοιχεία για την ενοχή του.

Παρόλ' αυτά, τον έδιωξαν από τη Γαλλία και πήγε στην Αγγλία, όπου και κατηγορήθηκε πως ήταν ο κακοποιός Τζουζέππε Μπάλσαμο (Giuseppe Balsamo), για να το διαψεύσει ο ίδιος ενώπιον του αγγλικού λαού και να του ζητήσουν και συγγνώμη όσοι τον είχαν κατηγορήσει.

Ο Καλιόστρο πήγε στη Ρώμη και έπεσε σε παγίδα κατασκόπων της Ιεράς Εξέτασης, οι οποίοι είχαν παρουσιαστεί με σκοπό δήθεν να τους μυήσει σε τεκτονικές τελετές. Ο Καλιόστρο σχεδίαζε να συστήσει τεκτονική ομάδα μέσα στη Ρώμη. Αυτή του η πρωτοβουλία δε σχετιζόταν τόσο με τη δίψα για τις καινοτόμες ιδέες αλλά με ζητήματα επιβίωσης: οικονομικά στο χείλος της καταστροφής και έχοντας ενεχυριάσει τα κοσμήματα της συζύγου του, χωρίς να είναι κανείς πρόθυμος να του κάνει πίστωση αποφάσισε να συγκροτήσει μία τεκτονική στοά, οι οικονομικές εισφορές των μελών της οποίας θα μπορούσαν να γίνουν αντικείμενο εκμετάλλευσης από τον ίδιο και θα του εξασφάλιζαν ζωή άνετη. Είχε προηγηθεί καταγγελία από τη Λορέντζα Φελτσιάνι, γνωστή και ως Σεραφίνα, σύζυγο του Καλιόστρο, για την όλη δράση του, καταγγελία που έγινε στις 26 Σεπτεμβρίου 1789. Συνελήφθη στις 27 Δεκεμβρίου 1789, φυλακίστηκε στο Κάστρο των Αγγέλων (Castel Sant' Angelo) και, λίγο μετά, καταδικάστηκε με απόφαση που εκδόθηκε στις 7 Απριλίου 1791 σε θάνατο ως τέκτονας. Αργότερα ο Πάπας Πίος Στ' μετέτρεψε την ποινή του σε ισόβια δεσμά.

Μετά την απόπειρα δραπέτευσις του, οδηγήθηκε στις φυλακές του Σαν Λέο, στην Εμίλια-Ρομάνια της Ιταλίας, όπου και πέθανε στις 26 Αυγούστου το 1795.

Το θέμα της ταινίας περιλαμβάνεται στο έργο :
The Marie Antoinette romances (comprise eight novels)